Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 05:01:07am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
08 SES 03 A: Sustainability, nature and wellbeing education
Time:
Tuesday, 22/Aug/2023:
5:15pm - 6:45pm

Session Chair: Venka Simovska
Location: Joseph Black Building, C305 LT [Floor 3]

Capacity: 82 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
08. Health and Wellbeing Education
Paper

Sustainable Outdoor Education: Supporting the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Children and Young People through Arts in Nature Practice

Nicola Walshe

UCL Institute of Education, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Walshe, Nicola

Although wellbeing is a complex term, it can be understood as a social model of health which places individual experience within social contexts, emphasizing the promotion of health rather than causes of illness (Atkinson et al., 2012). Critically, 18% of children and young people in England suffer a severe mental health illness (NHS, 2022), and yet 70% of those who experience mental health problems have not received appropriate support at a sufficiently early age (DfE, 2018). To combat this, schools are increasingly expected to support mental health and wellbeing, but receive few resources to do so. As such, there is a need for establishing mechanisms for supporting the health and wellbeing of children and young people which are relatively easy embedded within the school day, as well as using limited financial resource, to ensure sustainability.

Substantial benefits for wellbeing may be derived from contact with nature (WHO, 2016), and schools that promote children’s engagement with nature have reported children have fewer social, emotional, and behavioural difficulties and higher academic engagement and achievements (Browning and Rigolon, 2019). Despite this, six in ten children reported to have spent less time outdoors since the start of coronavirus and the initial lockdown (Natural England, 2020) and opportunities for outdoor learning in school are diminishing due to staff confidence in outdoor teaching and high demands in delivering the curriculum (Plymouth University, 2016). Although providing good quality greenspace within communities may begin to address this, undertaking activities outdoors which support children developing an affective relationship with nature can bring benefits for health and wellbeing ‘over and above’ those expected from visiting nature alone. One approach to addressing this is through arts and creative practice within nature.

There is a growing consensus around the importance of arts for children in schools, with evidence suggesting that arts education can aid physical, cognitive, social and emotional development, as well as improving both mental health and social inclusion (Durham Commission on Creativity and Education, 2019). Muhr (2020) argues that arts-based activities offer a powerful way for people to connect to nature because they evoke an embodied response that fosters an emotional connection. In a systematic review, Moula, Palmer and Walshe (2022) synthesised existing evidence concerning the interconnectedness between arts and nature, and their impact on the health and wellbeing of children and young people. The review suggested that engagement with arts in nature was found to increase nature connectivity with nature explicit, thereby increasing children’s broader wellbeing. However, despite the evidence as to the benefits of arts-in-nature practice for both children’s wellbeing and their nature-connectedness, it is important to consider their reach and sustainability. Such programmes are often stand alone or require significant funding for long-term engagement of external creative practitioners and organisations. There is a need for greater sustainability with implications for how creative practitioners delivering arts-in-nature practice engage and work with primary schools and how the practice is embedded in the school culture and ethos. Accordingly, this paper reports on the findings from a survey of creative practitioners delivering arts-in-nature practice with children to explore the following research questions:

RQ1: What are the perceived impacts of the arts-in-nature practice undertaken by organisations?

RQ2: In what ways do organisations work with volunteers, teachers, and schools to make their arts-in-nature practice more sustainable?

RQ3: What are barriers to greater reach and sustainability for organisations and practitioners in delivering arts-in-nature practice for children in schools?

This is part of a wider Branching Out project to establish how successful elements from an established mental health arts-in-nature programme can be scaled up from small, school-based approaches to whole school communities.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This article reports on one aspect of an exploratory multi-level mixed methods approach (Creswell et al., 2011). The overall study explored how adults in the wider community can be activated as volunteers to support the practice and thus build capacity for wider implementation. To address the study questions, the research comprised two work streams: the first (reported in this paper) was a survey of national arts organisations to identify arts organisations who have or who are currently providing arts and/or nature-based activities in schools either as part of the curriculum or as extra-curricular activity. Such organisations would be required to support the wider implementation of the Branching Out model described above.
The survey comprises a series of open and closed questions which map the types of programmes the arts organisations deliver or have delivered in the past and includes questions on the aims and mission of each organisation, and sustainability issues. Specific questions for the national arts organisation survey were developed following the interviews with the teachers and artists and the survey was piloted on members of the partner organisation for face and content validity prior to dissemination. A further aim of the survey was to gather contact details of interested organisation and thus develop a national network of organisations providing arts and/or nature-based activities for children and young people, to enable future partnerships, to register interest in future involvement in the Community Artscapers project, and for dissemination purposes. There was an open call survey; we were not trying to achieve a representative sample but rather to access as many organisations or individual practitioners combining arts and nature in their practice with children and/or in schools in the UK.
The majority of data collected was qualitative, but responses were generally short and concise and content analysis informed by Bowling (2014) was conducted in order to code and categorise this data. The survey questions served as an a priori thematic framework around the characteristics of arts-in-nature activities delivered; the aims and impacts of activities; working with volunteers, teachers, and schools; and barriers to greater reach and sustainability. Codes were identified under each theme to identify patterns within the data. Importantly, the frequency of a concept does not necessarily signify its importance (Bowling, 2014) and therefore analysis involved critical reflection on the meaning within the context of responses.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The final number of completed responses comprised of 47 organisations providing arts and/or nature-based activities for children and communities across the UK. For all, the combination of arts and nature was significant in providing a mechanism through which to connect children, young people and their families to nature, empower them to have a positive impact on their local environment, and support their mental health and wellbeing. While most of the activities were delivered by artists, there was involvement from both teachers and volunteers. Although engagement by teachers was a preferred model of practice as it opened up opportunities for a more collaborative and sustainable way of working between organisations and schools, it was identified as being challenging to facilitate because of a lack of pedagogical expertise on the part of teachers, and limited resource and opportunity to support their training. This was often underpinned by a lack of support by senior leadership within schools, exacerbated by a policy context of a crowded curriculum and accountability regime based on pupil achievement in a narrow range of subjects, and a lack of understanding as to how arts-in-nature practice might contribute improved educational standards, as well as more broadly to children’s mental health and wellbeing, environmental and sustainability education.
Recommendations for future policy or practice are: providing access to more and better professional development around the process of arts-in-nature practice provided for teachers; using community volunteers as a mechanism for adding capacity and supporting sustainability of impact for arts-in-nature practice; and paying greater attention to multi-agency level working where professionals work together to create more coordinated approaches to embedding arts-in-nature practice in schools and communities. Together, these have the potential to create more sustainable and impactful practice for the benefit of children and young people and the communities within which they live.

References
Atkinson, S.; Robson, M. Arts and health as a practice of liminality: Managing the spaces of transformation for social and emotional wellbeing with primary school children. Health & Place 2012 18(6), pp.1353-8292.
Bowling, A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw-hill education: UK, 2014. Available online:  https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6lOLBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=ann+bowling+research+methods&ots=YfJ9aw8IiD&sig=SboIQ0GtQWkaxyWjDc7QWY_LYdY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ann%20bowling%20research%20methods&f=false (accessed 14 February 2022).
Browning, M.; Rigolon, A. School green space and its impact on academic performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16, 3, p.429.
Creswell, J.W.; Carroll Klassen, A.; Plano Clark, V.L.; Clegg Smith, K. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), 2011. Available at: https://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/best_prac_mixed_methods.pdf (accessed 14 February 2022).
Department for Education (DfE) Mental health and wellbeing provision in schools: Review of published policies and information. Research report. 2018. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/747709/Mental_health_and_wellbeing_provision_in_schools.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2022).
Durham Commission on Creativity and Education. Durham commission on creativity and education. Arts Council England & Durham University, 2019. Available online: DurhamReport.pdf (accessed 14 February 2022).
Moula, Z.; Palmer, K.; Walshe, N. A Systematic Review of Arts-Based Interventions Delivered to Children and Young People in Nature or Outdoor Spaces: Impact on Nature Connectedness, Health and Wellbeing. Front Psychol – Health Psychology, 2022, 13: 858781.
Muhr, M.M. Beyond words – the potential of arts-based research on human-nature connectedness. Ecosystems and People 2020, 16(1), pp.249-257.
National Health Service. Mental Health of Children and Young People in England 2022 - wave 3 follow up to the 2017 survey. 2022. Available online: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/mental-health-of-children-and-young-people-in-england/2022-follow-up-to-the-2017-survey#:~:text=In%202022%2C%2018.0%25%20of%20children,between%202020%2C%202021%20and%202022 (accessed on 21 January 2023).
Natural England. The People and Nature Survey, 2020. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/people-and-nature-survey-for-england (accessed on 21 January 2023).
Plymouth University. Transforming outdoor learning in schools: Lessons from the Natural Connections Project, 2016. Available online: Transforming_Outdoor_Learning_in_Schools_SCN.pdf (plymouth.ac.uk) (accessed 21 January 2023).
World Health Organisation [WHO]. Health in 2015: From MDGs millennium development goals to SDGs sustainable development goals. WHO: Switzerland, 2016. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/200009/9789241565110_eng.pdf;jsessionid=9EA834CCAEDD7BF85310D3F04AD0FFCD?sequence=1 (accessed on 21 January 2023).


08. Health and Wellbeing Education
Paper

Supporting Children and Young People’s Wellbeing and Engagement in Education through Forest School: a School-Community Partnership in England

Lucy Tiplady1, Harriet Menter2

1Newcastle University, United Kingdom; 2Scotswood Garden, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Tiplady, Lucy

A recent report by UNICEF (2021) revealed that across Europe 16.3% of children aged 10-19 years are living with a mental disorder, equating to 9 million children and young people (CYP). In England this is thought to be even higher with 18.0% of children aged 7 to 16 years and 22.0% of young people aged 17 to 24 years living with a probable mental disorder (Newlove-Delgado et al, 2022). The Covid-19 pandemic has caused many additional stresses for children and families (Crawley et al., 2020) and those already experiencing social and economic disadvantage are also more likely to experience mental health difficulties (Reiss, 2013), with concerns in the UK that the socio-economic mental health gap is widening (Collishaw et al., 2019). Poor mental health impacts on many areas of a young person’s life, including educational disadvantage and increased risk of school exclusion (Ford et al., 2018) with many young people unable to satisfactorily engage in their education and schools increasingly looking for ways in which they can support the mental health and wellbeing of their pupils.

Forest School is an outdoor educational experience, usually in a wooded area, that takes place regularly over an extended period of time (minimum of two seasons in the UK). It is facilitated by a trained practitioner, who supports the CYP to lead their own learning (Knight, 2011). Its popularity has been increasing across the UK and internationally over the past 20 years, with a developing body of research evidence of the positive benefits on young people’s emotional wellbeing and behaviour (McCree, Cutting & Sherwin, 2018; Coates & Pimlott-Wilson, 2019). Forest School sessions are designed to build confidence and wellbeing through providing enjoyable and achievable challenges in a supportive environment, developing good relationships (between young people and adults and supporting relationships between the young people) and using reflection to encourage the CYP to internalise positive self-narratives as they emerge.

Scotswood Garden is an award winning independent charity based in an urban area of the North East of England. The garden is located in one of the most deprived neighbourhoods of the UK, classified in the highest 10% for income, education, skills and training, health and crime deprivation (DCLG, 2019). The education manager (Menter) has Level 3 Forest School accreditation and extensive experience delivering sessions with local schools and delivering Forest School training. Through school-community partnerships, the Breeze project uses the Forest School approach with CYP experiencing social and emotional difficulties, including mental health concerns and difficulties engaging in education. Following a pilot year in 2017-2018, Breeze worked with four local schools from 2018 to 2021; sessions took place at the community garden and were initially co-planned and co-delivered between the Forest School practitioner and school staff for one day a week over a school year (some adaptations were necessary during school closures during the Covid-19 pandemic). In parallel two members of school staff engaged in Forest School training and accreditation and over the school year gradually took on independent delivery of sessions. After the first year, schools either continued to access the garden independently or were assisted to find suitable alternative woodland and schools were invited to join a Breeze Forest School network, which continues to develop with new schools and offers on-going support to aid long-term sustainability.

This paper will present evidence of the impact of the Breeze project for the CYP in relation to wellbeing and engagement in education, together with the processes that led to change and affordances and barriers experienced. Findings will be discussed in relation to European context and relevance in supporting CYP’s wellbeing and engagement in education internationally.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The research used a co-production approach, recognising the reciprocal transfer of knowledge, skills and expertise from each partner (Hatzidimitriadou et al., 2012).  The researcher (Tiplady) worked in close collaboration with Scotswood Garden and school staff to become an integrated part of the school-community project; this enabled the researcher to experience and hear the narratives told as the project developed, from both adults and CYP.  
Theory of change, proven to be particularly effective in co-producing frameworks for understanding complex change in social interventions (Dyson and Todd, 2010), supported the co-production process and was used to evaluate the impacts of the project.  A steps of change diagram was developed for each of the four schools through in-depth interviews with stakeholders (drawing upon theory, research and practice knowledge) and sought to articulate the anticipated pathways to change for the CYP.  
Data collection was decided in partnership between the researcher, schools and Forest School practitioner and sought to evidence (or not) the steps of change.  It also took account of what was reasonable and practical for each stakeholder, most notably during the Covid-19 pandemic when a number of adaptations were necessary.  Data included a range of participatory research methods, including photograph elicitation, used to facilitate discussions between the researcher, CYP and staff, researcher observations, researcher interviews with parents and carers, Forest School diaries produced by the young people and quantitative data that were part of the schools’ usual data collection processes, for example attendance records where this was deemed to be relevant.  Qualitative data was analysed thematically using Braun and Clark’s (2006) six phase process and quantitative data using descriptive statistics.  This was then used deductively, in relation to evidencing (or not) the theory of change.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
We will share results from the evaluated theories of change that show where there was either: ‘substantial evidence to support’; ‘partly evidenced’; ‘not evidenced in this period but no evidence to refute’; or ‘evidence to refute’.  The range of data collected (from young people, staff, parents/carers, school data and researcher observations) allowed triangulation and confidence in findings.  The richness of the data produced helped us to understand some of the causal processes that led to impact, and understand how different parts of the Forest School approach and school-community partnerships achieved impact through creating alternative learning environments.
The environment created through the Breeze project appears to enable CYP to develop in different ways, in accordance with their individual needs and development. This includes providing an environment in which young people can develop their social skills with adults and peers, developing a connection or appreciation of nature and/or practical skills such as whittling or fire building.  This was articulated by the young people as different both in terms of the physical environment (outdoors, woodland, nature) and pedagogically (learner-led, open-ended).  This alternative environment appeared to be experienced as less stressful for many young people, enabling individuals to over-come anxieties and engage in learning through risk-taking.  A minority of CYP struggled initially, particularly in making their own decisions and interacting with peers, however, where there were high adult to CYP ratios, young people were supported to follow their own interests over time and to develop skills.
We will further reflect on the experiences of the school-community partnerships, from the perspective of the community practitioner and from school staff through interviews with the researcher.  We will discuss where and how partnerships worked well and where it was more difficult, which could ultimately lead to a reduction in impact for the CYP.  

References
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), pp.77-101.
Coates, J. K. and Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2019) Learning while playing: children’s forest school experiences in the UK.  British Educational Research Journal, 45 (1), pp.21-40.
Collishaw, S., Furzer, E., Thapar, A. K. and Sellers, R. (2019) Brief report: a comparison of child mental health inequalities in three UK population cohorts, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, pp.1547–1549.
Crawley, E., Loades, M., Feder, G., Logan, S., Redwood, S., and Macleod, J. (2020) Wider collateral damage to children in the UK because of the social distancing measures designed to reduce the impact of COVID-19 in adults, BMJ Paediatrics Open, 4, e000701.
DCLG (2019) English Indices of Deprivation 2019. Retrieved 24.09.22.: http://dclgapps.communities.gov.uk/imd/iod_index.html#
Dyson, A. and Todd, L. (2010) Dealing with complexity: Theory of change evaluation and the full service extended schools initiative. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 33(2), 119-134.
Ford, T., Parker, C., Salim, J., Goodman, R., Logan, S., and Henley, W. (2018) The relationship between exclusion from school and mental health: A secondary analysis of the British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Surveys 2004 and 2007, Psychological Medicine, 48(4), pp.629-641.
Hatzidimitriadou, E., Mantovani, N. and Keating, F. (2012) Evaluation of coproduction processes in a community-based mental health project in Wandsworth. London: Kingston University/St George’s University of London.
Knight, S. (2011) Forest School for All, Sage: London.
McCree, M., Cutting, R. and  Sherwin, D. (2018) The hare and the tortoise go to Forest School: taking the scenic route to academic attainment via emotional wellbeing outdoors, Early Child Development and Care, 188 (7), pp. 980-996.
Newlove-Delgado, T., Marcheselli, F., Williams, T., Mandalia, D., Davi,s J., McManus, S., Savic, M., Treloar, W. and Ford, T. (2022) Mental Health of Children and Young People in England, 2022. Leeds: NHS Digital.
Reiss, F. (2013) Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: A systematic review, Social Science & Medicine, 90, pp. 24-31.
UNICEF (2021) The State of the World’s Children (2021) ON MY MIND Promoting, protecting and caring for children’s mental health United Nations Children’s Fund. Available at: State of the World's Children 2021.pdf (unicef.org)


08. Health and Wellbeing Education
Paper

Schools addressing Health, Wellbeing and Sustainability Challenges: a Literature Review of Educational Perspectives, Approaches and Contributions of Educational Interventions

Monica Carlsson

Aarhus University, Denmark

Presenting Author: Carlsson, Monica

This paper presents a literature review that highlights educational perspectives on social justice, equity and children and young peoples’ agency when schools address health, wellbeing and sustainability challenges. The study furthermore explores the approaches and contributions of interventions addressing these challenges. As pointed out in UNs Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 and the UNESCO 2021 policy paper Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education, the crises following the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing global environmental and climate change has deepened the global learning crisis. The pandemic has highlighted our close links with nature and increased a long-standing concern for the physical, mental and emotional well-being of children and young people. The pandemic has also highlighted the interconnectedness of health and wellbeing challenges and broader sustainability challenges related to the degradation of nature, and environmental and/or climate change (Franzolin et al. 2022; Malqvist and Powell 2022). Research on global challenges in education’s response to the pandemic underline the critical role of education to strengthen children and young peoples’ agency, as well as the need for equitable education (Darlington et al. 2022, Hill et al. 2020). Due to the resurgence of interest in young peoples’ agency in research within the related areas of health, wellbeing and sustainability education, it has become clear that agency is understood and conceptualized in many different ways, from what we have power to do, to experiences of reflecting and deciding (Gallay, Pykett and Flanagan 2021; Lorimer, Knight and Shoveller 2022).

Global environmental changes in conjunction with substantial social justice issues related to health and wellbeing are impacting us all, raising significant concerns related to how education can address these sustainability challenges. Although they are impacting us all, we are not all of us “in this together”, as some are more afflicted by health, wellbeing and sustainability issues because of race, ethnicity, gender, economy and geographic locality (Andreotti et al. 2018). Current research findings indicate that Nordic countries typically relate to educational ideas such as democracy, and critical citizenship (Carlsson 2023), whereas other countries, such as Japan, might have more natural science or health science grounded understandings of how to address these challenges (Dean and Elliot 2022). In low and middle-income countries in regions such as Central/South America and Southern Africa, social justice issues have had a broader societal resonance conceptualized in debates about health, wellbeing and climate challenges (Lotz-Sisitka 2009; Torres and Faucher 2022). Perspectives on inequalities and social justice issues related to health, wellbeing and sustainability challenges are understood in different ways in different cultural contexts, which underlines the relevance of education research exploring and recognizing many forms of social and cultural diversity (Carlsson and Torres 2022; Dean and Elliot 2022).

Broad explorations of educational perspectives on social justice and equity in relation to how health, wellbeing and sustainability challenges are addressed in education, and the approaches and contributions of interventions addressing these challenges has been relatively absent, especially ones that takes into account the agency of children and young people. The literature review study is guided by the following research question: Which educational perspectives (on social justice, equity and young peoples’ agency), approaches and contributions of educational interventions in schools, or in collaboration with schools, addressing health, wellbeing and sustainability challenges can be identified in literature? The key findings from the analysis of the included journal articles in the study will be presented at the conference. Below I report on the methodology and primary findings from the search and selection processes in the literature review, and highlight a few selected interim findings on educational perspectives identified in the studies.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A systematic literature search of research journal articles was conducted in the PsycInfo and ERIC databases resultating in 2423 citations. These where imported to Covidence systematic review system, where a screening and selection process took place in two steps: first of title and abstract, where after the selected citations of full texts where screened and the final selection of journal articles where included in the depth analysis. Search terms included: (Health* OR Wellbeing*) AND (Children* OR "young people*" OR youth*) AND School AND Education AND ("social justice*" OR Equity) AND sustainability. The selected texts where read in full and appraised for quality using an adaptation of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for systematic reviews. Details where extracted for the analytic matrix guided by the PRISMA 2020 statement (Page et al. 2021) which prepared the articles for critique and interpretation (including but not limited to descriptions of research aim, questions, design (methods and theories) and key findings). A table was used to collate the findings, which provided an informed basis for critical analysis and enabled presentation of results relevant to the research question.
Inclusion criteria: Journal articles published in English between January 2013 and December 2022, peer reviewed, target population aged 7–15 (primary school, middle and lower secondary school). They should explore educational perspectives (aims, values and ideals related to social justice, equity, and agency), approaches (directives, strategies, methodologies) and contributions (outcomes and impact) of educational interventions (i.e. designed for delivery through teaching-learning processes and pedagogical practices by educators).
Exclusion criteria: Studies focusing on exploring determinants of health, wellbeing and sustainability challenges and the extent of problems and issues (rather than educational interventions addressing these). Studies primarily focusing on effects or outcome of interventions (omitting educational perspectives and approaches).
Study selection: Academic databases identified 2423 records using the search string made of all combined search terms. After the removal of duplicates 1917 records where available for screening of title and abstract in Covidence. Following the exclusion of records based on titles and abstracts, 52 articles were sought for retrieval, and assessed for eligibility. Additional 12 papers were identified by a search in reference lists, of which 8 were retrieved. A total of 60 articles were thoroughly assessed. After excluding articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria described above 40 articles were eventually included for the coding and analysis processes.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Health and wellbeing challenges were in focus in the studies selected for coding and analysis. The thematic focus in these studies showed a great variety of themes and topics, including, but not limited to, physical activity, food, sexuality, gender equality, oral health, special needs, disability and HIV/AIDS education, violence/abuse, substance use, pregnancy prevention, COVID-19. Educational perspectives underlined aims and values of founded in empowerment, hereunder understanding the practices and effects of power and inequality and empowering students to transform social conditions. This included perspectives emphasizing social justice and equity dimensions arguing for pedagogies addressing redistribution (of educational goods), representation (participation) and recognition (of identity), and studies highlighting social and cultural diversity as a value in and a precondition for classroom wellbeing.
Studies addressing the interconnectedness of health and wellbeing challenges and challenges related to the degradation of nature, and environmental and/or climate change included: Educational perspectives on equity and power stressing aims uncovering the multiple representations of reality constituted in language and discourse and providing counter narratives to deficit-based discourses on youth empowerment. Capability perspectives going beyond the notion of subjective and economic wellbeing, emphasizing that education should provide freedom of making choices in life caring for both people and nature. Nature-based perspectives strengthening health-equity through cultivating appreciation of the natural world and an understanding of human-nature interdependence. As pointed out in previous research exploring transformative expectations in sustainability education (Carlsson 2021), perspectives highlighting transformative forms of agency where more in focus in studies in settings where schools where collaborating with local communities than in formal education settings in schools. Whole school approaches aiming at creating opportunities for cooperative learning and engagement in addressing environmental challenges affecting health provided one example of this.

References
Andreotti, V. et al. (2018). Mobilising Different Conversations about Global Justice in Education: Toward Alternative Futures in Uncertain Times, Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review, Vol. 26, 9-41.
Carlsson, M. (2023). The Twinning of Bildung and Competence in Environmental and Sustainability Education: Nordic Perspectives. In: Trifonas, P.P., Jagger, S. (eds) Handbook of Curriculum Theory and Research. Springer.
Carlsson, M. (2021). Transformative expectations in environmental and sustainability education research. Outlines, 22(1), 230-264.
Carlsson, M. & Torres, I. (2022). Exploring the idea of school meals as an element of educating for viable futures. In D. Ruge, I. Torres, & D. Powell (eds.). School Food, Equity and Social Justice: Critical Reflections and Perspectives, 215-228. Routledge.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ (accessed on 13.01.2023)
Damianidou, E. & Georgiadou, A. (2022). Keeping students close or afar? Whom, how and what for, Teachers and Teaching. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2022.2062728
Darlington, E., Fields, J., Greey, A. and Leahy, D. (2022). Guest editorial: Health education's response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Global challenges and future directions, Health Education, Vol. 122(1), 1-4.  
Dean, SN. and Elliot, S. (2022). Urgency, Equity and Agency: An Assembly of Global Concerns and Interests in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability, International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 9(2).
Franzolin, F.; Carvalho, G.S.; Santana, C.M.B.; Calegari, A.d.S.; Almeida, E.A.E.d.; Soares, J.P.R.; Jorge, J.; Neves, F.D.d.; Lemos, E.R.S. (2022). Students’ Interests in Biodiversity:Links with Health and Sustainability. Sustainability, 13, 13767.
Gallay, E.; Pykett, A.; Flanagan, C. (2021). “We Make Our Community”. Youth Forging Environmental Identities in Urban Landscapes. Sustainability, 13, 7736.
Hill. C.; Rosehart, P.; St. Helene, J.; Sadhra, S. (2020). What Kind of Educator Does the World Need Today? Reimagining Teacher Education in Post-Pandemic Canada. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 46(4), 565-575.
Lorimer, K., Knight, R. & Shoveller, J. (2022) Improving the health and social wellbeing of young people: exploring the potential of and for collective agency, Critical Public Health, 32:2, 145-152.
Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2009). Climate injustice. How should education respond? Kagawa, F. Selby, D. (eds.) Education and Climate Change. Living and Learning in Interesting Times.
Malqvist M, Powell N. (2022). Health, sustainability and transformation: a new narrative for global health. BMJ Global Health 2022;7:e010969, 1-3.
Page, M.J. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71.
Torres, I. & Faucher, C. (2022). We underestimate the impact of climate change on education. Latinoamerica21. https://latinoamerica21.com/en/we-underestimate-the-impact-of-climate-change-on-education/


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany