Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 03:34:12am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
07 SES 13 C: Addressing Displacement and Vulnerability in (Intercultural) Education
Time:
Thursday, 24/Aug/2023:
5:15pm - 6:45pm

Session Chair: Henrike Terhart
Location: James McCune Smith, TEAL 707 [Floor 7]

Capacity: 102 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
07. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Paper

The Russia-Ukraine War In Classroom And School – Current Experiences And Needs Of School Employees

Stephan Gerhard Huber1, Mareen Lüke1, Paula Sophie Günther1, Gregor Steinbeiß2

1Pädagogische Hochschule Zug, Switzerland; 2Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

Presenting Author: Huber, Stephan Gerhard; Lüke, Mareen

More than half a year past the beginning of the war in Ukraine, tensions in the education system are increasing, the lack of staff and resources for integrating refugee students pose great challenges – on a daily basis. This article provides insights into a quantitative sub-study (N=1158) of the School-Barometer based on the experiences of German teachers and school principals in managing the Russia-Ukraine war at school and the incoming students from Ukraine. Consequences of the war touch many areas of life, far beyond Ukrainian and Russian national borders. Thus, schools in German speaking countries were challenged to deal with the war on two levels: 1) thematically with resulting questions in classroom, concerns and fears of all involved in school and 2) with integrating students and teachers from Ukraine seeking protection in these countries. Hence, our study aims to present and discuss the experiences of school staff concerning both, the arrival of refugees and dealing with the topic of peace and war in the classroom.

Wishes, ideas, and experiences of school employees in dealing with the war in these two dimensions were published in Author et al. (2022) based on the qualitative research data, a compilation of online resources was provided, too. Anderegg (2022) developed a checklist for school principals concerning the consequences of the Russia-Ukraine war for schools. A guide for teachers on how to deal with the Russian war in Ukraine was also designed by Berens (2022).

Our study aims to present and discuss the experiences of school staff concerning the arrival of refugees and dealing with the topic of peace and war in the classroom.

RQ.: What are the experiences of teachers and school principals in Germany with arriving refugee students from Ukraine and the topic of war and peace in the classroom?


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The presented study is a sub-study within the School-Barometer cluster, which monitors the situation of schools since the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (Author et al., 2020). The data were collected using online questionnaires via Unipark and analyzed descriptively. The sample includes 1,085 teachers and 73 school principals (N=1158) in Germany who were surveyed between March and May 2022. Four main topics of the survey items are: 1) Teaching and School, 2) School Offerings, 3) Organization and Staff, and 4) Support. Even though conducted in Germany, the survey results are transferable to the situation in Austria and Switzerland to a certain extent.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
67% of staff were able to respond (rather) well to student’s questions regarding the Russian war in Ukraine. The war as topic took up a larger part of the lesson. More than half (57%) of school staff believe that refugee students should be taught in designated refugee classes. Only 34% believe that refugee children and youth should be taught inclusively in regular classes. 59% of school staff believe that refugees from Ukraine should be taught in different locations. Only about a third (30%) would like to see them being taught at one location all together.
While about one-third of staff feel well or rather well prepared for teaching students from Ukraine, one-third (32%) feel more or less well prepared and about one-third (36%) feel not well or rather not well prepared to deal with the influx of new students.
Most time (11 hours/week) should be spent on offers in German, state the questioned teachers and school leaders. This is followed by leisure activities, activities in the home language (8 hours/week) and finally activities in English. Most employees think that 10 hours per week should be spent on psychological services.
Cooperation among colleagues is perceived low or rather too low by 28% of employees. 27% of school employees are somewhat satisfied or satisfied with the available resources for integration services. 31% are more or less satisfied and 41% are (rather) dissatisfied.
On average, eight refugee students were admitted to one school. An additional 18 refugee students are expected per school. More than half (53%) of school administrators feel that the school system provides enough information on how to deal with the war. Nearly two-thirds of school administrators (61%) find that the school system does not coordinate. An average of two additional staff for refugees are desired and three independent of refugees.

References
Anderegg, N. (2022). Krieg in der Ukraine: Checkliste für Schulleitende. Schule Verantworten | führungskultur_innovation_autonomie, 1(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.53349/sv.2022.i1.a184
Authors (2022, 2020)
Berens, C. (2022). Ukraine-Krieg im Unterricht thematisieren. On Lernen in der digitalen Welt. Begleiten statt benoten, 9, 32–35.
Klinger, U. (2022). Ukrainische Kinder in der Schule. Drei geflüchtete Lehrerinnen berichten aus Deutschland und der Ukraine. Lernende Schule. Teacher Leadership, 98, 37–40.


07. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Ignite Talk (20 slides in 5 minutes)

The Face of a Ukrainian School Learner Haunted by the War: Case of France

Olena Kovalchuk1, Tetyana Medina2

1Aix Marseille University, France; National University of Food Technology, Ukraine; 2Chernivtsi National University named after Yuriy Fedkovich

Presenting Author: Kovalchuk, Olena; Medina, Tetyana

More than ten months after the crisis in Ukraine escalated, the situation remains dire for children and their families. The conflict in Ukraine has caused the fastest and largest displacement of people in Europe since World War II.

According to the International Children's Fund UNICEF as of December, 2022, the total number of refugees fleeing Ukraine reached nearly 16 million people including 1.2 million children, are currently abroad. These children are a part of the potential of Ukraine. It is especially important for every child, who was forced to flee from Ukraine because of the war, to have a sustainable and convenient education in a protective country. It is also equally important that a child adapts to the country's educational institutions and at the same time does not deviate from Ukrainian educational standards, and continues to study relevant subjects.

European schools have opened their doors to Ukrainian externally displaced children in order to help adjusting to local communities and enter their education system. An increasing number of French classrooms has opened doors for Ukrainian families and their children, but while French education faced urgent reaction for the refugee flow some schools lacked tools and effective practices for refugee and migrant inclusive education.

The literature on topic of refugee integration in local school classrooms traditionally distinguishes two aspects:

- On the one hand, the literature describe teachers readiness to work in multicultural classroom. The key factor then, in creating successful classroom communities, is teachers who are able to identify the specialized needs of refugee children and who are culturally responsive to the needs of refugee children in their classrooms (Candappa, 2000; Olsen, 2006; Goodwin, 2002).

- On the other hand, strategic studies how do refugee students find the inspiration and demonstrate strong resilience, positive future expectations, and high motivation at school (e.g., Bartlett et al., 2017; Blanchet-Cohen et al., 2017; Oppedal et al., 2017; Pastoor, 2015; Peterson et al., 2017; Shakya et al., 2010). Some authers debate whether the refugee experience may have an impact on education (Cerna, 2019, see also Ferede, 2010; Lynnebakke et al., 2020). Or how refugee students, influenced by their past experience in their home countries, feel disconnected to a sense of community within their own ethnic group, in the local communities to which they have been resettled, and within the local school communities in which they have been enrolled (Hernandez, Denton, & Macartney, 2009; Boyson & Short, 2003).

Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine forced many people to flee their home and search for protection in neighboring European countries. While European countries have already taken many actions to address refugee learners’ educational needs, equal attention needs to be paid to their psychosocial needs.

To meet the challenges stated above, we launched the project under the title "Schooling of refugee children in the French education system" aims to study the schooling and adaptation of Ukrainian children in French schools.

This project was focused on describing a typical refugee school child who sustained external displacement during the war in Ukraine. We planned to discover the challenges and perspectives for adaptation of Ukrainian children in French schools. The objectives of the project were aimed at taking actions:

- to accumulate statistics on how many Ukrainian refugees of the school-age are there in France and how many of them attend schools;

- to make a comprehensible comparison of the school systems and school standards of Ukraine and France

- to provide qualitative research and collect empirical data to analyze the huddles and conveniences of the life of a refugee school children in time of war in Ukraine.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The proposed project adopts a mixed methods research design, which involves the combination of qualitative and quantitative research and data (Creswell, 2014). Mixed methods design overcomes the false dichotomy between positivist and non-positivist philosophies by embracing a pragmatic epistemology that allows researchers to use a variety of approaches to answer research questions that cannot be answered with a singular method. Specifically, the proposed project follows the approach that Creswell (2014) describes as "exploratory sequential mixed methods", whereby the researcher first begins with a qualitative research phase, studies documents and explores the viewpoints of attendees. The data is then analyzed and fed into a second quantitative phase by filling in the research tool. For the proposed project, the research process will first include a review of documents and mapping of student perspectives, before gathering measurable results from a larger sample of participants.
A comparative analysis of the methods of schoolchildren's adaptation to the new school environment was be carried out. For the survey data collection we are focused on:
- schoolchildren from among displaced persons in secondary education institutions in Ukraine and France;
- teachers of schools that accepted schoolchildren from among the displaced persons;
- representatives of education management bodies in Ukraine and France

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
- Actual problems of integration of displaced schoolchildren in France in conditions of military aggression was identified
- A comparative analysis of the methods of schoolchildren's adaptation to the new school environment was carried out;
- Recommendations were developed for spreading positive practices in working with displaced schoolchildren
- The obtained results were disseminated at the international round table of UERA (Ukrainian Educational Researcher Association) with the participation of members of the association of education researchers from as well as representatives of education management bodies
- Ukrainian researchers were able to established contacts between representatives of the national association of educational researchers of France (member of EERA)

References
1.Allen J. (2007). Creating welcoming schools: A practical guide to home- school partnerships with diverse families. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.Betancourt, T. S., & Khan, K. T. (2008). The mental health of children affected by armed conflict: Protective processes and pathways to resilience. International Review of Psychiatry,
3. Cerna, L. (2019). Refugee education: Integration models and practices in OECD countries (OECD Education Working Paper No. 203). Directorate for Education and Skills, OECD.
4.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.Fazel, M., Reed, R. V., Panter-Brick, C., & Stein, A. (2012). Mental health of displaced and refugee children resettled in low-income and middle-income countries: Risk and protective factors. The Lancet, 379(9812), 266–282.
6.Lynnebakke, B., Pastoor, L. D. W., & Eide, K. (2020). Young refugees’ pathways in(to) education. Teacher and student voices: Challenges, opportunities and dilemmas. CAGE Project Report Study 3a. MESU, University of Copenhagen.
7.Noriko Suzuki (2010). Challenges for immigrant students in France https://www.childresearch.net/papers/multi/2010_01.html


07. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Paper

Fostering Courageousness and Confidence: Outdoor Adventure Learning Experiences for Children Living with Vulnerability

Amanda Mooney, Louise Paatsch, Trevor McCandless, Andrea Nolan, Julianne Moss, Tebeje Molla

Deakin University, Australia

Presenting Author: Moss, Julianne; Molla, Tebeje

Recent years have witnessed a broad range of natural disasters adding to the existing disadvantages faced by many young people in Australia. These included bush fires, floods and the Covid-19 global pandemic. In the Australian context, Quay et al (2020) argued, these tragic events have had effects that have not been equal. Beyond the individual impacts for young people such as increased isolation, worry and uncertainty compounded during periods of school closures (Mulholland & O’Toole, 2021), international contributions highlight how such events contribute to escalating experiences of violence, abuse and trauma for many young people (Save the Children, 2020). For children already living with disadvantage and potentially vulnerability, such circumstances have likely ‘exacerbated pre-existing inequalities, increasing the economic, social and psychological pressures on children’ (Mulholland & O’Toole, 2021, p. 329). As such, understanding how best to support young people experiencing vulnerability and social injustices through educational interventions has become critically vital (Drane, Vernon & O’Shea, 2021). Contextual and localised examples of how to achieve this in practice are less evident in the literature.

This paper reports on a project designed to explore the potential of an outdoor adventure program for children aged 6-12 years recruited from areas of identified disadvantage in Victoria, Australia. Specifically, children from schools located in bushfire-impacted locations and regions identified as below the average Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA) benchmark of 1000 were purposefully invited to attend. The short, three-to-four-day program sought to provide opportunities that challenge young people to take risks and learn new skills through outdoor experiences otherwise unattainable or not readily available to them. These include swimming with sea mammals, rock climbing and other otherwise ‘risky’ activities under the supervision of highly qualified staff. The research into the effectiveness of the program generated data from multiple sources including direct observations, surveys, interviews and student drawings and written feedback. Participants stressed notions of ‘overcoming fear’ and of ‘meeting the challenges’ they faced as influential, often labelling these as ‘life-changing’ experiences that made them believe they would be more likely to try new things in the future. Central to the nature of the experience had been the non-judgemental encouragement and scaffolded pedagogies employed by program staff that supported young people to tackle challenges fostering courage and confidence. The data collected from students, teachers, program staff and educational researchers supports the thesis that such experiences are likely to provide students with lasting and multiple benefits, now and into their futures.

Many participants spoke of an activity they were asked to perform that they initially perceived to be beyond their capabilities. These activities had been purposefully included in the program to challenge children’s self-belief in their own abilities. Nevertheless, a near constant refrain from the participants was that they were supported into challenging themselves to take risks in trying activities, trusting in the support of the program staff. This encouragement was done with care, rather than by placing the child in a position where they felt pressured to participate. As such, the children understood that if they had agreed to participate that the achievement was their own, and based on their own, improved self-belief.

The change in attitude many of these children experienced surprised even themselves. This led to an increased preparedness to attempt activities or to try new foods. This change in attitude was often noted by their teachers. As such, the power of outdoor education when provided by expert, qualified and dedicated staff proved highly impactful upon the lives of these young people, providing them with a means to reappraise their understanding of their own limitations and abilities.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Theoretically informed by research in outdoor learning and pedagogy (e.g., Gilbertson et al, 2016, Louv, 2010, Parry et al, 2021, Smith & Welsh, 2019), and the broader influence of Dewey’s (1938) notion of experiential learning on the international field, the more extensive research project upon which this paper is based relied upon a mixed-methods study that utilised a range of qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data on the effectiveness and impact of a program designed to encourage young people to engage with the education program’s four main aims: to become more physically active, to choose healthier food options, to be more confident and to show and be shown respect.

The quantitative data was collected by the program itself in the form of feedback surveys completed by students (N=1368) and their teachers (N=148). This evaluation tool was developed prior to and without the input of the educational researchers. These data included a range of demographic information concerning the students and their attitude towards aspects of the experience as recorded on Likert scale entries.

Qualitative data was obtained from interviews with teachers (N=13), program staff members and program executive staff (N=9). It was also obtained by direct observations of program activities by the research team, and from the written and drawn responses of student participants (N=112) in response to the four themes of the program. Program documents and webpages also provided data.

These various data sources were triangulated and thematically analysed (Braun and Clarke, 2006) to provide the analysis reported here. The educational researchers involved in this project met frequently to interrogate and analyse the data collected to develop a nuanced understanding of the benefits of the program and to consider the implications of the data collected to date.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Providing young people with opportunities to engage in outdoor activities that extend their beliefs about what they are capable of achieving provides an opportunity for them to become more willing to potentially take on challenges in other aspects of their lives as well. Many of the young people said that the experiences they had on the program allowed them to understand that they were capable of more than they initially believed – and that often the difference between success and failure was a willingness to participate.

The activities often felt like they were just beyond the abilities of the young people. As such, our findings reveal the value of ‘relational’, ‘quiet’ and ‘challenge through choice’ pedagogies employed by program staff had on fostering notions of courage and confidence among participants. This meant that the young people themselves were most likely to discuss the change in attitude to attempting the unfamiliar as being one of the major learning outcomes of the program for themselves.  The paper concludes with a consideration of the ways in which various pedagogies can be deployed through outdoor adventure activities to support young people living with vulnerability and trauma.

References
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). ‘Guide to understanding the Index of Community Socio-educational Advantage (ICSEA)’.  Accessed 10 January 2023.  https://myschool.edu.au/media/1820/guide-to-understanding-icsea-values.pdf
Braun. V., & Clarke, V.  (2006).  ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’.  Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Drane, C., Vernon, L., & O’Shea, S.  (2021).  Vulnerable learners in the age of COVID-19: A scoping review.  The Australian Educational Researchers, 48, 585-604.
Dewey, J.  (1938), (1997 edition). Experience and Education.  New York, Touchstone.
Gilbertson, K., Bates, T., McLaughlin, T & Ewert, A.  (2006).  Outdoor Education: Methods and Strategies.  Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Louv, R.  (2010).  Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder.  London, Atlantic Books.
Mulholland, M., & O’Toole, C.  (2021). ‘When it matters most: a trauma-informed, outdoor learning programme to support children’s wellbeing during COVID-19 and beyond’.  Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 329-340.
Parry, B., Thompson, J., Holland, M., & Cumming, J.  (2021).  ‘Promoting Personal Growth in Young People
Save the Children. (2020).  ‘Children at Risk of Lasting Psychological Distress from Coronavirus Lockdown’.  Accessed 26 January 2023.  https://reliefweb.int/report/world/children-risk-lasting-psychological-distress-coronavirus-lockdown-save-children
Smith, R., & Walsh, K.  (2019).  ‘Some things in life can’t be ‘Googled:’ A narrative synthesis of three key questions in outdoor education’.  Journal of Youth Studies, 22(3), 312-329.
Quay, J., et al.  (2020).  ‘What future/s for outdoor and environmental education in a world that has contended with COVID-19?’.  Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 23, 93-117.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany