Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 05:24:02am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
07 SES 01 C: Intersectional Perspectives on Sex Workers, Same-Sex Families and Women's Stories
Time:
Tuesday, 22/Aug/2023:
1:15pm - 2:45pm

Session Chair: Isabella Pescarmona
Location: James McCune Smith, TEAL 707 [Floor 7]

Capacity: 102 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
07. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Paper

Attitudes of Taiwanese Heterosexual Older Adults Toward Same-sex Families

Alexander MacDonald, Hung-Che Wang, Te-Sheng Chang, Romi Aswandi Sinaga

National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan

Presenting Author: MacDonald, Alexander; Chang, Te-Sheng

Introduction

Policies and laws regarding child adoption in some countries have created barriers for gay and lesbian couples in the adoption process (Shelley-Sireci & Ciano-Boyce, 2002). Taiwan was the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in 2019; yet, the Legislative Yuan has not legalized the adoption of children by same-sex couples. One of the main reasons for the child adoption barrier in Taiwan is that most older adults insist that children adopted by same-sex families oppose the traditional Chinese culture.

According to Herek (2002), older adults express less favorable generic attitudes toward sexual minorities than younger participants. Moreover, being a man, older, and highly religious predicted higher levels of sexual prejudice regarding same-sex parenting (Costa & Salinas-Quiroz, 2018). In addition, people with traditional gender beliefs tend to have more negative attitudes toward same-sex couples (including lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons) and same-sex parenting than people who hold beliefs in equal roles across gender (Jewkes et al., 2015; Webb et al., 2017). Negative beliefs about children raised by same-sex families are commonly characterized by unfounded fears related to children’s development, such as social rejection, homophobic bullying, and confusion about sexual orientation or gender identity (Gato & Fontaine, 2013). Moreover, negative attitudes toward gays and lesbians are one of the significant influences on public disapproval of parenting in same-sex families.

These previous studies on prejudice against gay and lesbian individuals among heterosexual adults or older adults were from the U. S. or other western countries. Comparatively, few empirical studies have been devoted to attitudes toward same-sex parenting within the context of the society in Asian countries. Since Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in 2019, it is very important to understand the attitude toward same-sex parenting among older Taiwanese adults, the generation most resistant to change (Lee & Lin, 2020). What is the nature of Taiwanese heterosexual older adults’ attitudes toward same-sex parenting? Is there any significant relationship between Taiwanese heterosexual older adults’ background variables and their attitudes toward same-sex parenting? Without answering these questions, the prejudice against same-sex parenting cannot be solved and the goals of social justice for same-sex families cannot be achieved. Therefore, this study seeks to contribute to the limited literature on the effect of gender, age, educational background, gender role beliefs, and attitudes toward gay men and lesbians on attitudes toward same-sex families of Taiwanese heterosexual older adults.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Methods
Participants
The participants were 352 Taiwanese older adults aged between 56-84 with an average of 66.6. The participants consisted of 87 (24.70%) men and 265 (75.30%) women. All study participants selected “heterosexual” for the “sexual orientation” item at the beginning of the questionnaire. This paper refers to these older adults who self-identified as heterosexual as “Taiwanese heterosexual older adults.”

Measures
Beliefs in gender roles were measured by the Beliefs in Gender Role scale (adapted from Costa & Davies, 2012) with 10 five-point Likert items. The 10 items were divided into three subscales: traditional beliefs in masculinity, traditional beliefs in femininity, and beliefs in equal roles. The three factors accounted for 59.16% of the total variance for the scale, and the coefficient of internal consistency reliability was .73.
Attitudes toward gay and lesbian people were measured by the Attitudes toward Gay scale and the Attitudes toward Lesbian scale which were modified from Morrison and Morrison’ study (2011). Each scale has two subscales: Modern Prejudice toward gay people and Heterosexual Hegemony toward gay people for the gay scale and Modern Prejudice toward lesbian people and Heterosexual Hegemony toward lesbian people for the lesbian scale. The two factors accounted for 65.44% and 67.16% of the total variance for the gay scale and the lesbian scale. The coefficients of internal consistency reliability were .85 and .88 for the gay scale and the lesbian scale, respectively.
Attitudes toward same-sex families were measured by the Attitudes toward Gay Family Scale, and Attitudes toward Lesbian Family Scale (adapted from Frias-Navarro & Monterde-i-Bort, 2012). Each scale has two subscales: Opposition of same-sex parenting and opposition of children adjustment. The two factors accounted for 66.77% and 74.04% of the total variance for the gay family scale and the lesbian family scale. The coefficients of internal consistency reliability were .88 and .92 for the gay family scale and the lesbian family scale, respectively.

Analytic Strategies
A t-test was used to explore the gender difference in gender role beliefs, attitudes toward gays and lesbians, and attitudes toward same-sex families. A Pearson’s product-moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between demographic backgrounds, gender role beliefs, attitudes toward gays and lesbians, and attitudes toward same-sex families. Moreover, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was applied to analyze the direct and indirect effect of predictors and mediators of attitudes toward same-sex families.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Conclusion
This study did not find that gender, age, and educational background predicted attitudes toward same-sex families. Both males and females had similar attitudes toward gay and lesbian people, gay and lesbian parenting, and their children’s adjustment, thus indicating that Taiwanese heterosexual adults have similar attitudes toward gay and lesbian families. This finding was in contrast with previous studies that sampled undergraduate students or younger participants were more likely to have different perceptions; males were more negative than their female counterparts.
Regarding attitudes toward gay parenting, traditional beliefs in masculinity and femininity factors were not significant, while modern prejudice and heterosexual hegemony toward gay people significantly predicted attitudes toward gay parenting. For children’s adjustment to gay families, participants’ beliefs in equal roles factor were not significant. In contrast, modern prejudice and heterosexual hegemony toward gay attitudes significantly predicted attitudes toward children’s adjustment on gay families.  
Traditional beliefs in masculinity and femininity factors did not significantly predict attitudes toward lesbian parenting, while modern prejudice and heterosexual hegemony attitudes significantly predicted attitudes toward lesbian parenting. For children’s adjustment to lesbian families, no factors regarding belief in gender roles were significant. Modern prejudice and heterosexual hegemony attitudes significantly predicted attitudes toward children’s adjustment on lesbian families.
This study contains several limitations regarding sampling. First, the researchers used a convenience sample. Second, there was a possible effect of social desirability as there always is when data is collected using self-report questionnaires. Third, the research did not consider the relevance of the variables that can counter stress and may help mediate the relationship between gender beliefs and attitudes toward same-sex families. Future studies investigate how homonegativity affects Taiwanese heterosexual older adults and if this correlates with resilience factors, such as personality characteristics and family environments.

References
Costa, P. A., & Davies, M. (2012). Portuguese adolescents' attitudes toward sexual minorities: Transphobia, homophobia, and gender role beliefs. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(10), 1424-1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.724944

Costa, P. A., Salinas-Quiroz, F. (2018). A comparative study of attitudes toward same-gender parenting and gay and lesbian rights in Portugal and in Mexico. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(13), 1909-1926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1519303

Frias-Navarro, D., & Monterde-i-Bort, H. (2012). A scale on beliefs about children's adjustment in same-sex families: Reliability and validity. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(9), 1273-1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.720505

Gato, J., & Fontaine, A. M. (2013). Anticipation of the sexual and gender development of children adopted by same-sex couples. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 244-253. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.645484

Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(1), 40-66. https://doi.org/10.1086/338409

Jewkes, R., Morrell, R., Hearn, J., Lundqvist, E., Blackbear, D., Lindegger, Quayle, M., Sikweyiya, Y., & Gottzén, L. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity: Combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 96-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1085094

Lee, I. C., & Lin, W.-F. (2020). Us versus Them: The Debates on the Legislation of Same-Sex Marriage (1994 – 2015) in Taiwan. Journal of Homosexuality, 1-22. doi:10.1080/00918369.2020.1848148

Morrison, M. A, & Morrison T. G. (2011). Modern homonegativity scale. In Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures (3rd ed.) (pp. 392-394). Routledge.
        https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881089


Shelley-Sireci, L., & Ciano-Boyce, C. (2002). Becoming lesbian adoptive parents: An exploratory study of lesbian adoptive, lesbian birth, and heterosexual adoptive parents. Adoption Quarterly, 6(1), 33-43. http://doi.org/10.1300/J145v06n01_04

Webb, S. N., Chonody, J. M., and Kavanagh, P. S. (2017). Attitudes toward same-sex parenting: An effect of gender. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(11), 1583-1595.         https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1247540


07. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Paper

Rethinking Inclusion: empowering the children of sex workers in Kalighat, Kolkata India

Khaleda Gani Dutt

Department of Special Education Stockholm University, Sweden

Presenting Author: Dutt, Khaleda Gani

In South Asia, the intersection of culture, class, gender, and access to education
addresses the unique interpretations of disability which is related to the social
environment. The metanarratives encased in the study elicit global concerns of social
exclusion, stigmatisation, marginalisation as well as exploitation of the weak and the
vulnerable. The red-light district of Kalighat is located in a neighbourhood of south
Kolkata and comprises of migrant women, not only from the nearby villages but also
from Bangladesh and Nepal. Most of the women and children are sold into prostitution
by their families and friends, whilst others come into the city to seek work and are forced into the flesh trade. The city of Kolkata has emerged as a hub for the trafficking of girls. The study explores the pivotal role of inclusion that is transforming the lives of
children living in the red -light district of Kalighat in the city of Kolkata, India. The
‘safe space’ provided by the stakeholders enables the children of Kalighat to complete
their education. This ensures that the children are not harvested back into the human
trafficking industry. The qualitative enquiry sheds light on the lived-in realities of the
informants. The findings from the study reinforces that ‘inclusion’ is imperative
towards realising dreams, aspirations and building bridges within societies to attain
equality for every person everywhere. Education is a great leveler only if societal
conditions are conducive for children to reach their potential. Hence, inclusion is
symbiotic to social justice and imperative for accessibility to education. The success
stories reinforce that there must be sustainable human resources to create opportunities for women and children who live in the shadows and are often overlooked. It signals that intervention needs to be contextualised in order to meet, address and overcome the challenges that hinders the realisation of human rights.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A qualitative enquiry based on constructive-interpretive approach to enable us to comprehend the tensions present and help in the attempt to interpret the socio-structuralworld (Law, 2004). The ontological positioning underpins the social constructions in which race, class and the socio-economic background play a critical role in the life of the informants.
Semi-structured interviews with both informants and stakeholders was conducted to capture the emerging world-view of the informants and the new ideas that are generated through the interviews (Merriam, 1997). The field work was carried out in Kolkata in 2017-2018.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The results underpins that inclusion is symbiotic to social justice and imperative for accessibility to education. It is not only about each learner being valued and respectedbut each individual person valued for irrespective of their socio-economic background,race, ethnicity, caste and religion is not discriminated. Hence, inclusion can be seen tantamount to social justice which in turn entails the absolution of stigmatizing labels.
Therefore, inclusion is a process and not an end result. If we are to ensure that education is a developmental right for all then it is imperative to tackle the root problems, hindrances and challenges. This study reveals that poverty is the common denominator which often restricts the social and economic benefits of
education reaching especially those who are deprived of three-square meals a day or fall below the poverty line. In order for inclusive education to work its magic one has to ensure that basic needs off every man, woman and child are met i.e. food, clothing and shelter. The safe space offered by the Kalighat Morning Club was a springboard for the children to reach out to their dreams, aspirations and give vent to their aesthetic skills.

References
Bhalla, N. (2016, May 12). South Asian nations unite over anti-child trafficking drive, helpline planned. U.S. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-indiachildren-
trafficking/south-asian-nations-unite-over-anti-child-trafficking-drivehelpline-
planned-idUSKCN0Y31EO
Carter, B. (2015). Benefits to society of an inclusive societies approach (revised version).GSDRC Applied Knowledge Services. Helpdesk Research Report. https://gsdrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/HDQ1232.pdf.
Mcdermott, R. F., & Kripol, J. J. (2003). Encountering Kali: In the Margins, at the center in the West. Motilal Banarsidass.
Gill, H. (2014). Living in the Shadows: An exploration of life in the red light districts of Kolkata. http://porterfolio.net/uploads/article/file/6273/Al_Jazeera__Living_in_the_Shadows.pdf
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods Third Edition SagePublications.
Rao, S & Kalyanpur, M. (2015). South Asia and Disability Studies: Time for a
Conversation. In Rao, S & Kalyanpur Ed. South Asia & Disability Studies
Redefining Boundaries & Extending Horizons M Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
New York
Stonehill, A. (2006). Sex Workers in the City of Joy. The Independent.
https://indypendent.org/2006/06/sex-workers-in-the-city-of-joy/
Shakespeare, T. (2006). The Social Model of Disability. In Davis, L.J. (red.) (2006).The disability studies reader. (2. ed.) London: Routledge.
UNESCO. (2020). Inclusion and education: All means All. https://en.unesco.org/gem-report/report/2020/inclusion
UN. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York, NY
Walker, M. (2006). Towards a capability‐based theory of social justice for education policy‐making In Journal of Education Policy. Taylor & Francis.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02680930500500245?scroll=top
&need Access=true.


07. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Paper

Intercultural Stories. Women’s Voices in Educational Contexts

Isabella Pescarmona, Giulia Gozzelino

University of Turin, Italy

Presenting Author: Pescarmona, Isabella; Gozzelino, Giulia

The fulfilment of the Human Rights of women is still lagging in Europe. Discrimination on the grounds of gender and sex remains widespread and has been further exacerbated by the economic crisis and ensuing austerity measures adopted in some European States, which have impacted on women disproportionately (COE, 2023). Recognising that intersectionality refers to a situation in which several grounds of discrimination (based on i.e. gender, colour, socio-economic status, age, migrant background, or disability) operate and interact with each other in a way that is inseparable and produces specific types of oppression, many women face intersecting inequalities in the European countries and intersectional policies cannot be implemented without centring racialised people (UE, 2023). European guidelines underline the need to recognise how racialised women are at a heightened risk of violence and how intersecting forms of discrimination exacerbate the consequences of gender-based inequalities, including due to the persisting biases and stereotypes.
Within the current international debate that calls for action to reduce inequalities (ONU, 2015) and to promote spaces for dialogue in our complex societies (Besley&Peters, 2012), our research project “Female voices, plural perspectives” (Authors, 2023) intends to open a perspective which is less explored in the intercultural educational discourse. It aims to engage women with a migrant background that are active constructors of relationships and positive actions in family and social-educational contexts and create safe meeting spaces, where they can take the floor and overturn the stereotypes and prejudices that accompany the representations and the educational interventions often aimed at them.
Following this direction, our project wants to promote the visibility of these women from diasporas in our multicultural societies, by highlighting their contribution in innovation-making professional roles and in countering discrimination and harassment and by analysing bias, stereotypical representations and missing representations in educational and social services.
By crossing their stories, we recognise the crucial role of racialised women in the changing process of Italian educational contexts and promoting equality, gender equality, respect, awareness-raising, non-discrimination, intercultural sensitivity and inclusiveness in social systems.
In the frame of critical, feminist, and decolonial pedagogy studies (Ngũgi, 1986; hook, 1990; Adichie, 2006), we would like to create a space where to encourage storytelling, recognize the educational value of these women's experience, and foster the processes of speaking out. Listening to and entering into dialogue with these women's voices can allow us to educate ourselves to a plural gaze and to cultivate narratives for a more inclusive and equal society.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This project requires the choice of a methodological approach sensitive to the encounter with otherness and capable of unhinging an ethno-centric research perspective, by adopting a non-binary and non-static vision of identities as well as putting the researcher “in relation” and “in dialogue on an equal footing” with other voices. Thus, in order to give back to the women interviewed the right and power to narrate their version of individual and collective history, we developed a qualitative research employing professional life history (Goodson & Sikes, 2001) as a core method.
As already experimented in other research (Scheffler 1991, Riessman, 2008; Wolcott, 1994; Gobbo, 2004, 2017), the emphasis on narratives and stories is peculiar to an intercultural discourse (Bhatti et al., 2007) which, by making the voice of researcher’s interlocutors heard, provides access to how people understand themselves, develop and interpret events in their professional and personal lives, and express their point of view. Such a research approach has its roots in the reflections developed by the sociology of deviance, the feminist movement, and the anthropology of education, which are inspired by the concepts of agency and social protagonism and recognised in narrative methods the opportunity of rendering justice, legitimacy and dignity to often unspoken realities, like racial, social and gender discrimination.
Over the course of one year, we have encountered many women with a migrant background actively working in the socio-educational field (as teachers in school; cultural mediators; project managers in extra-school contexts; educators in advocacy activities for other women; journalists and writers committed to educational social justice issues) in Turin, North of Italy, and the surrounding area.
We conducted twenty in-depth interviews. These conversations started with a question-stimulus and then investigated in more depth some thematic areas, such as: the motivations, underlying values and objectives of professional project of these women; the transformation of their own professional role; the stereotypes and discriminations that emerge in their own working contexts and the strategies they implemented to deal with those; how and to what extent their own experience as women comes into play at the intersection of ethnic group belonging, personal history and professional role.
The interviews were analysed for recurring themes and patterns, according to the principles of Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss, 2009), taking care to identify the singularity and uniqueness of each personal path.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Through the voices of some of these women, we highlight how they construct their complex professional identities in relation to situated contexts in an original way. Starting from their experience “on the margins” (hooks, 1990) as women, mothers, members of a certain ethnic group and social class, professionals engaged in care and education, they put themselves back “at the centre” by becoming promoters of educational and social innovations, without giving up any of their identity dimensions. In the attempt to re-create spaces of equity and fight against discrimination, they take back the right to imagine themselves differently (Appiah, 1996). By doing so, they prompted the people they work with to imagine themselves as complex persons and often disrupted (at least a little) an predetermined social and political order.
These women offer an unprecedented position from which to articulate knowledge and give meaning to the world, challenging educational research to go beyond dominant discourses and calling on the researchers to re-position themselves as women, educational professionals, and activists.
Thus, entering into dialogue with these women becomes an opportunity to create a space for intercultural conversation between researchers, communities and institutions and construct new personal and collective stories.

References
Adichie, C. N. (2006, October). The danger of a single story. TED Conferences.
Appiah, K. A. (1996). Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections. In K.M. Appiah & A. Gutmann (Eds.), Color Conscious. The political morality of Race (pp. 30-105). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Authors, 2023. Voci femminili, sguardi plurali. Bari: Progedit
Bhatti et al (Eds.) (2007) .Social justice and intercultural education: An open-ended dialogue. London: Trentham Books.
Besley T., & Peters M. (2012) (Eds.). Handbook of Interculturalism, Educa- tion and Dialogue. NY: Peter Lang.
COE (2023). Women’s Rights and Gender Equality. At: https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/thematic-work/women-s-rights-and-gender-equality
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2009). La scoperta della Grounded Theory. Roma: Armando (Ed. or. 1967).
Gobbo F. (2004), “Cultural Intersections: the life story of a Roma cultural mediator”, in European Educational Research Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 626-640.
Gobbo, F. (2017). Bringing Up the Babies: Men Educators in a Municipal Nursery School of an Italian Town. In W. Pink, G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Urban Education (pp. 1263-1289). Dordrecht: Springer.
Goodson, I. F., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life History Research in Educational Settings. Learning from lives. Buckingham: Open University.
hook, b. (1990). Yearning : race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Ngugi, w.T. (1986). Decolonising the mind. London: Portsmouth, N.H
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences, London: SAGE.
Scheffler I. (1991), “Four Languages of Education”, in I. Scheffler, In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions, New York: Routledge, pp. 118-125.
United Nation (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York
UE (2022). European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2022 on intersectional discrimination in the European Union: the socio-economic situation of women of African, Middle-Eastern, Latin-American and Asian descent. At: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0289_EN.html
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. London: SAGE.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany