Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 02:56:54am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
16 SES 06 A: Teacher Education and ICT
Time:
Wednesday, 23/Aug/2023:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Olivia Wohlfart
Location: Gilmorehill Halls (G12), 217A [Lower Ground]

Capacity: 30 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
16. ICT in Education and Training
Paper

Taking All Along in the Digital Transformation – a Typology of Cross Phase Communities of Practice in Teacher Education

Jan Niemann, Anna Raneck-Kuhlmann, Birgit Eickelmann, Kerstin Drossel, Heike M. Buhl

Paderborn University, Germany

Presenting Author: Niemann, Jan

The need for digital competence development of teachers, which goes hand in hand with digital transformation, among other things, requires the adaptation of existing conceptual approaches and their transfer to all phases of teacher education to foster teachers' digital competences in Europe. This leads to challenges in teacher education, which are also addressed in the "Digital Education Action Plan" (European Commission, 2020). One key goal of this action plan is to develop “digital skills and competences for the digital transformation” (ibid., p. 12).

To achieve this goal, digitisation-related resources such as MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses), learning videos or digital training modules that are both theoretically sound and practice-oriented can be used in the context of (prospective) teachers' education and training. This approach has the advantage that digitisation-related competences of (prospective) teachers can be developed quickly and nationwide.

A profitable form of developing such digitisation-related resources can take place in cross-phase Communities of Practice (CoPs; van Ackeren et al., 2020) because the cooperation of representatives from diverse areas and phases of teacher education brings together different expertise. This contributes to the quality of the digitisation-related resources and possibly facilitates the transfer of the resources into the teacher education system by addressing the needs of school practice.

In general, transfer research has identified three main areas that are relevant for successful transfer: the characteristics of the learners, the characteristics of the learning situation, and the characteristics of the scope of application of the acquired knowledge (Baldwin, Ford & Prasad, 2018; Grossman & Salas, 2011). Central characteristics of the learners are their understanding of their role and their motivation to perceive the learning situation.

Among other things, this should be as close to reality as possible (ibid.) and is conditioned by the CoP work in the context examined here. Studies indicate that in general, learning from each other takes place in CoPs when there is a high degree of certain characteristics such as the diversity of the CoP members, the cohesion and group feeling, the quality of interaction and the free structuring of the CoP. Diversity refers to the composition of the CoP. If there is a high degree of diversity, the CoP members benefit from the different expertise. However, the basic prerequisite is a common basis of ideas so that compromises are possible in the CoP. With a high degree of cohesion, the openness in the CoP increases and the feeling of a group can also rise. With a high degree of interaction and the independent structuring of work, knowledge acquisition can also increase due to the possibility of adapting the structures to the needs of the group (Sagmeister, 2019; Henschel, 2001).

In addition, it requires the support of the organisations or institutions in which the new knowledge is to be applied, e.g., by creating situations in which this is made possible (Grossman & Salas, 2011).

These general assumptions that apply to transfer and CoPs have so far been studied mainly in the context of economic organizations. However, the context-specific determinants of teacher educators' transfer in cross-phase CoPs and whether there are different types of transfer in the context of teacher educators' CoP work remain unexplored. Based on the research context and data of the COMeIN project (Communities of Practice for Innovative Teacher Education) with more than 400 participants from all phases of teacher education, this contribution focuses therefore the following research questions:

1. To what extent can types of transfer be identified in the cross-phase CoP work of teacher educators?

2. Which determinants can contribute to the transfer success of digitisation-related resources into the teacher education system?


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
To answer the research questions, data from a qualitative online survey from the German project COMeIN (Communities of Practice for Innovative Teacher Education) are used, in which work is being done across phases in CoPs on the development of digitisation-related resources. Due to the objective of the project, the data is particularly suitable for answering the research questions. In the COMeIN project, more than 400 representatives from all three phases of teacher education in Germany (first phase: university studies; second phase: preparatory period for school teachers; third phase: in-service teacher training) work together in five subject-based and three interdisciplinary CoPs. The CoPs are staffed according to the subject expertise of the representatives of the different phases. The work of the CoPs is coordinated by so-called innovation position holders (N=16). In the summer of 2022 they were questioned in writing in an online survey on various topics, such as the status of work, conditions for success of the CoP work and cross-phase cooperation, the transfer between the different phases of teacher education in their CoP, conditions for successful transfer to teacher education and conditions for the sustainability of the project.
The collected data was evaluated by means of qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz, on the basis of which a type formation was subsequently carried out (Creswell & Poth, 2018; Kuckartz & Rädiker, 2022). First, the material was coded using deductive and inductive categories (Kuckartz, 2014). The deductive categories were developed using a theoretically derived analysis model and the inductive categories were supplemented by the material. Both content structuring and evaluative categories were formed (Kuckartz, 2014). In accordance with the procedure explained by Kuckartz, the type-building was then carried out in five steps. Based on the research question, the attribute space that was used for the type-building was first defined. Then the individual cases were grouped together to form the typology. This was followed by a description of the typology and a subsequent allocation of the cases to the feature-homogeneous types formed. Finally, a relationships’ analysis was carried out with secondary variables to extract the determinants of successful transfer (Kuckartz, 2014).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
With the help of the qualitative content analysis, types of cross-phase transfer in CoPs of teacher education as well as determinants for successful transfer could be identified.
Two types of transfer emerge: unilateral transfer and cooperative transfer through cross-phase CoP work. Unilateral transfer is characterised by the fact that transfer between the phases of teacher education only takes place in one direction. In this case, the first phase of teacher education develops the digitisation-related resources, while the second and third phases participate only slightly or not at all in the CoP work.
Cooperative transfer can be divided into two subtypes. The division of transfer with divided responsibilities and the collaborative transfer. Transfer with devided resposibilities takes place between the phases. Here, the first phase of teacher education mainly develops the digitisation-related resources and the second and third phases participate in the form of advice and support in testing the resources. In the case of collaborative transfer, there is a two-way transfer between all phases of teacher education.
In addition to the types, determinants for successful transfer could be identified on three levels:
At the institutional level, the establishment of fixed structures such as permanent coordination and sufficient time resources are seen as relevant. In addition, the integration of research projects in the second and third phases and the adaptation of frameworks appear to be a determinant conducive to transfer. At the CoP level, work process structures such as highlighting the added value of cooperation for all phases appear to be particularly important. At the individual level, the motivation of the participants is relevant for the transfer. Overall, the stronger networking of the three teacher training phases appears to be a central overarching transfer determinant. The implications of these results will be discussed in the context of teacher education in Europe.

References
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (4. ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
European Commission (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027. Resetting education and training for the digital age. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/default/files/document-library-docs/deap-communication-sept2020_en.pdf
Henschel, A. (2001). Communities of Practice. Plattform für individuelles und kollektives Lernen sowie Wissenstransfer. Universität St. Gallen.
Kuckartz, U. & Rädiker, S. (2022). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung: Grundlagentexte Methoden (Grundlagentexte Methoden, 5. Auflage). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis. A guide to methods, practice & using software. London, England: SAGE.
Sagmeister, M. (2019). Situiertes Lernen: Informelles Lernen am Arbeitsplatz in der Community of Practice. In M. W. Fröse, B. Naake & M. Arnold (Hrsg.), Führung und Organisation (Perspektiven Sozialwirtschaft und Sozialmanagement, S. 417–432). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
van Ackeren, I., Buhl, H. M., Eickelmann, B., Heinrich, M. & Wolfswinkler, G. (2020). Digitalisierung in der Lehrerbildung durch Communities of Practice. Konzeption, Governance & Qualitätsmanagement des ComeIn-Verbundvorhabens in NRW. In K. Kaspar et al. (Hrsg.), Bildung, Schule und Digitalisierung (S. 321–326). Münster: Waxmann.
Grossman, R. & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: what really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103–120.
Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T. & Prasad, J. (2018). Transfer of Training: The Known and the Unknown. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104443


16. ICT in Education and Training
Paper

Media Didactical Considerations of Student Teachers in the Creation and Use of Digital Learning Material

Magdalena Buddeberg, Nadine Sonnenburg

TU Dortmund University, Germany

Presenting Author: Buddeberg, Magdalena

The use of digital learning material offers new possibilities for teaching and learning in schools: Learning content can be conveyed in different forms of presentation (text, video, audio, graphics) and can be made available to students throughout the learning process, facilitating self-paced learning (cf. e.g. Sánchez Moreno & Martínez, 2022). Compared to analog media, digital media offer more opportunities in self-learning phases to adapt the learning material to the learners (adaptivity) and more interactivity to stimulate students' own activity and to provide them with direct feedback (Köster, 2018). Thus, the findings of Spitzler and Musslick's (2021) study indicate, that digital learning environments can help teachers to support students adaptively (ibid.). Furthermore, digital media can support the implementation of alternative didactic concepts, such as the flipped classroom approach (e.g. Álvarez-García & Enríquez-Díaz, 2020).

However, the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS) shows that in Germany, digital media are used less frequently in the classroom than in other countries (IEA-ICILS; Fraillon, Ainley, Schulz, Friedman, & Duckworth, 2019). Yet, the use of digital learning materials presupposes that teachers have been appropriately prepared for it and possess the corresponding competencies (Eickelmann, Drossel & Heldt, 2021). According to the state of research, this is precisely where a glaring deficit lies in the context of teacher training in Germany: For example, a shortcoming is evident in the adequate training of teachers in this area, according to which only about a quarter of teachers in each case have learned how to use digital media (25.9%) or apply them in teaching (26.6%) as part of their training (ibid.) – however, these data refer to the situation before the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a surge in digitization worldwide through the increased use of digital media in distance education (see, e.g., Sonnenburg & Hornberg, 2022), including Germany. At the same time, however, the pandemic also highlighted the lack of media competencies among teachers: One challenge that emerged were the different competencies and experiences of teachers who had to switch to (an almost) nationwide digital distance instruction unpreparedly (cf. in overview Sonnenburg, Buddeberg & Hornberg, 2022). Even though the study results show that younger teachers tended to be trained more in the area of digital media, indicating a gradual development of teacher education in Germany, there is still a considerable need for development (Eickelmann et al., 2021).

Particularly in the creation and use of digital learning materials, it is important that student teachers not only learn the technical skills to use digital media but receive support in the area of media didactic competence (see Blömeke, 2017). Appropriate learning opportunities are considered essential in teacher education for the acquisition of digital media competence in order to learn and practice the use of digital media in the classroom in a way that promotes learning (see e.g. Reintjes et al., 2021).

In order to teach student teachers both technical and didactic media competencies, we designed and implemented a teaching-learning concept for university teacher education. As part of this teaching-learning concept, student teachers create digital, interactive learning material themselves using the open source software H5P. They also test it in the role of the learner. This gives student teachers the opportunity to gain experience with digital interactive learning materials from both the teacher's and the learner's perspective. Based on this, the project presented here examines how student teachers can thereby be supported in dealing with media-didactic aspects in the creation and use of digital learning materials.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The teaching-learning concept was carried out in several semesters in the context of regular seminars. In summer semester 2022, it was used in the context of two master's seminars in the profession of education. The following questions were explored: How do the student teachers perceive their teaching and learning experience with digital, interactive learning material in the course?  And which media-didactic considerations regarding the design and use of digital learning materials are evident in the statements of the student teachers? These questions are addressed with a qualitative research approach. At the end of the course, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 students from these seminars. The sample consisted of master's students because they had already attended courses on general didactics in the bachelor's program and they also had initial experience in school practice through internships.  The interview guide includes questions on didactic considerations and the support provided by the self-study course we developed, the students' own learning experiences with interactive learning material, advantages, potentials, disadvantages and limitations as well as on the use of digital interactive learning material in school. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, which is a well-known procedure to evaluate qualitative data by being transparent and by following strict rules. According to the standards of the qualitative content analysis, a guideline to code the interviews was created (Kuckartz, 2016; Mayring, 2014). Subsequently, in the second step of the analysis, the relevant text passages of the interviews were assigned to categories using the software MAXQDA. The interviews were coded by two coders. By doing so, the various text passages of the different interviews were analyzed in a summary. The categories were created in a deductive-inductive way: First, deductive categories were formed based on the scientific discourse. These were then used to analyze the data material. In the course of the analyses, additional inductive categories were added from the data material. This procedure makes it possible both to tie in with previous scientific findings and to generate new findings from the data.  
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Initial results show that students reflect on the use of digital media in the classroom from a learner and teacher perspective based on the experience they had in the seminar. From the learner's perspective, they report the benefits of digital interactive learning materials such as learning at one's own pace, more intensive learning experiences, increased motivation due to increased self-activity, and a higher perceived learning success compared to analog learning with texts. From the perspective of a prospective teacher, the students' statements in the interviews show that the good design of interactive learning material is discussed as a prerequisite for greater learning success among the learners, the importance of cooperation between teachers in the joint design and use of digital interactive learning material is mentioned, and the importance of the continued need for personal learning support for learners by  teachers is reflected. The initial results thus provide indications that the teaching-learning concept presented here and the process-accompanying integration into regular seminars can promote technical as well as media-didactic competencies among students in the design of digitally supported learning material. On the basis of further findings, this paper identifies and discusses possibilities for implementing the teaching of media competencies to student teachers as a cross-sectional task in regular courses. Thus, this is not only a contribution for teacher education in Germany but the findings are equally relevant for other European and non-European countries.
References
Álvarez-García, B. & Enríquez-Díaz, J. (2020). Computer-based feedback to foster self-regulated learning in a blended learning environment: An experience in the financial area. In L. Daniela (Ed.), Pedagogies of Digital Learning in Higher Education (pp. 18–41). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019466-2

Blömeke, S. (2017). Erwerb medienpädagogischer Kompetenz in der Lehrerausbildung. Modell der Zielqualifikation, Lernvoraussetzungen der Studierenden und Folgerungen für Struktur und Inhalte des medienpädagogischen Lehramtsstudiums. Medien-Pädagogik. Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 3, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/retro/2017.07.13.X

Eickelmann, B., Drossel, K. & Heldt, M. (2021). ICT in teacher education and ICT-related teacher professional development in Germany. In J. Chi-Kin Lee & T. Ehmke (Ed.), Quality in Teacher Education and Professional Development: Chinese and German Perspectives (pp. 107–124). Abington: Routledge.
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2019). Preparing for Life in a Digital World: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 International Report. Amsterdam: IEA.

Köster, J. (2018). Video in the Age of Digital Learning. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93937-7_6

Kuckartz, U. (2016). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: Beltz. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173

Reintjes, C., Porsch, R., Görich, K., Gollup, P., Paulus, D. & Veber, M. (2021). Medienbildung in der Lehrer*innenbildung - Kohärenz der intendierten, implementierten und erreichten Curricula? In C. Reintjes, T.-S. Idel, G. Bellenberg & K. V. Thönes (Ed.), Schulpraktische Studien und Professionalisierung: Kohärenzambitionen und alternative Zugänge zum Lehrberuf (pp. 163–187). Münster: Waxmann.

Sánchez Moreno, M. & Martín Martínez, A. (2022). Analysis of the Flipped Classroom Model as a Proposal for Teaching Innovation. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(10), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i10.5385

Spitzer, M. & Musslick, S. (2021). Academic performance of K-12 students in an online-learning environment for mathematics increased during the shutdown of schools in wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 16(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0255629

Sonnenburg, N. & Hornberg, S. (2022). A global perspective on schooling in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Tertium Comparationis – Journal for International Comparative and Multicultural Education, 28(3), 241–249. https:doi.org/10.31244.tc.2022.03.01

Sonnenburg, N., Buddeberg, M. & Hornberg, S. (2022). The school system in Germany in times of the pandemic. Tertium Comparationis – Journal for International Comparative and Multicultural Education, 28(3), 332–355. https:doi.org/10.31244.tc.2022.03.05


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany