Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 05:43:53am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
99 ERC SES 04 C: Interactive Poster Session
Time:
Monday, 21/Aug/2023:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Dragana Radanović
Location: James McCune Smith, 745 [Floor 7]

Capacity: 162 persons

Interactive Poster Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Poster

Influences of Engaging in the Into Headship Programme Post-programme: Some Perceptions of Newly-Appointed Headteachers in Scotland.

Rosemary Grady

University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Grady, Rosemary

This poster will seek to illustrate a qualitative study of six newly-appointed headteachers in Scotland who have recently completed the mandatory qualification of Into Headship. As a course tutor on IH, the study is undertaken as the focus of my doctoral research.

In order to better understand the longer-term influences of the IH programme, I am curious to explore how former participants go on to further develop and apply their knowledge and understanding once appointed as headteachers post-programme. I am also interested in the significant prior learning and experiences participants bring to their IH studies and seek to explore the influence this has on them whilst on programme as well as post-programme.

Though IH is delivered by seven universities across Scotland, Education Scotland, which oversees the programme on behalf of the Scottish Government, collates an annual evaluative report. This report is based on a form of “satisfaction poll” completed by former participants at the point of course completion and is arguably unable to provide insights which deeply analyses or critically reflects upon the multiple influences of the IH programme. For IH, it is significant that only one study (Mowat, 2020) seeks to explore the ongoing development of former IH participants; however no studies were found which explicitly sought to do so over an extended time period or which studied former participants in permanent headship roles. Therefore, I believe it can be argued that there appears to be a clear “gap” in the field of knowledge related to the influence of the Into Headship programme.

Research Question

Taking account of the impact of leading during the COVID-19 global pandemic in Scotland:

In what ways do newly-appointed headteachers in Scotland perceive that their engagement in the Into Headship programme has influenced and continues to influence their leadership development in leading their school community?

1. Which aspects of participants’ leadership growth, sense of identity and related application of this understanding do they recognise to have been influenced /continue to be influenced (directly and/or indirectly) by engaging in the IH programme and in which ways?

2. Which aspects of participants’ leadership growth, sense of identity and related application of this understanding do they feel, have been/ are subject to other influences, contextual factors and other learning and in which ways?

Anticipated Outcomes

Through this study I hope to gain insights into:

  • how study participants transfer and apply leadership knowledge & understanding gained in the IH programme in the various contexts they function within across the system.
  • how study participants’ sense of identity as a headteacher has developed and continues to develop over time in their role as a newly-appointed headteacher
  • what other significant influences study participants identify alongside the experience of engaging in the IH programme
  • the part context, social learning, collaboration and engaging in networks/communities of practice plays in study participants’ ongoing development as headteachers

Key concepts are captured in a conceptual framework which has been constructed from the following dimensions:

  • “Perceptions of Into Headship influences”, “Other influences” and their entanglement in the enactment of the headship role
  • Notions of journeying i.e. personal and professional development over time, “Being, Becoming and Growing as a leader” (GTCS, 2021)
  • The development of the professional, situated and personal identities of school leaders (Day et al., 2007)

Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
My ontological beliefs about the nature of the study influence and seek to align my methodological choices in the design and enactment of my research approaches in order to realise the study aims. The study is a qualitative perception study, situated within the interpretivist paradigm due to the unique, contextualised  and individualised nature of each study participant’s experiences.
The  entire population of possible participants were those from IH cohorts from 2018-2021 across Scotland, and this overall group were invited to take part in a brief initial survey. A smaller sample who indicated agreement were invited to take part in the second phase of the study.
To ensure sufficient data creation which generated “thick descriptions” (Geertz,1973) whilst at the same time being mindful of the manageability of the study, a sample group of 6-8 were sought. Crucially, as this study focusses on in what ways newly-appointed headteachers apply and further develop their knowledge & understanding once appointed, study participants were required to be approximately within their first year of permanent headship at the time of the study (specifically within 6-18 months of appointment). They also needed to be willing to/ have capacity to take part over the timescale of the study.
A purposive sampling approach in identifying the sample of 6-8 participants was adopted. Purposive sampling is a non-probability approach which is useful for qualitative researchers as it allowed an element of judgement to be applied to the sample selection process. I do not aim for generalisability within this study and my sample does not seek to directly represent the population. However, I did wish to include a range of participants who are not atypical, who work in a range of diverse contexts and will be able & willing to engage in depth with the process.
In the second phase of the study, a group of six headteachers have now been engaging in a series of three hour long semi-structured interviews, at six-month intervals. They are asked to deeply reflect on their IH experience, aspects of their ongoing leadership development, including events such as critical incidents and relate this to any perceived direct influence from their Into Headship experience and other influences they believe to be of significance.  During the final interview, participants will be asked to reflect upon their leadership development using a “River of Experience” reflective narrative tool. (Iantaffi, 2012).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The first two instances of data creation through semi-structured interviews have taken place. The data from Interview One was analysed by adopting an open coding approach (Saldana, 2014) from which themes were then constructed. Both inductive and deductive approaches were adopted to organise and reorganise the data in relation to the research questions and  when  interrogating aspects of the conceptual framework. Though there were crosscutting themes and recurring influences which all participants noted to varying degrees, data from Interview One was used recursively in Interview Two to further extend reflections which were uniquely significant to each individual participant.
Increased understanding of leading strategic change,  engaging in critical reflection, developing an enhanced ability to critique policy & educational literature and the benefits of networking with others were typically reported as influences of the Into Headship programme. These themes recurred in all the participant’s data. However,  findings of the study,  so far, also demonstrate the significance of the uniqueness of each individual’s own values and beliefs about leadership; with their personal and professional identity also being reported as fundamentally important to their leadership practice. Other reported key influences so far include the other people who support the ongoing development of participants over time as well as the multiple experiences and professional learning prior to, during and after their time engaging on the Into Headship programme.  The final instance of data creation will take place in May 2023.

References
References

Crow, G., Day, C., & Møller, J. (2017). Framing research on school principals’ identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265-277.

Day, C., Sammons, P., & Stobart, G. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting work, lives and effectiveness. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Geertz, C. (1973). Chapter 1/Thick Description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays, 3-30.

GTCS, (2021). Standard for Headship, GTCS publication.


Iantaffi, A. (2012). Travelling along ‘rivers of experience’: personal construct psychology and visual metaphors in research. In Visual Methods in Psychology (pp. 305-317). Routledge.

Mowat, J. (2020). New Directions in Headship Education in Scotland. In L. Becket (Ed.),

Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.

Key Texts

Cowie, M., & Crawford, M. (2009). Headteacher preparation programmes in England and Scotland: do they make a difference for the first-year head? School Leadership & Management, 29(1), 5-21. doi:10.1080/13632430802646354
Crawford, M., Cowie, M., Crawford, M., & Michael, C. (2012). Bridging theory and practice in headship preparation: interpreting experience and challenging assumptions. In (Vol. 40, pp. 175-187). United Kingdom.
Davidson, J., Forde, C., Gronn, P., MacBeath, J., McMahon, M., & Martin, M. (2008). Towards a mixed economy of Head Teacher development: Evaluation Report to the Scottish Government on the Flexible Routes to Headship Pilot.
Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland's Future: Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland: Scottish Government (Scotland).
Forde, C., McMahon, M., & Gronn, P. (2013). Designing Individualised Leadership Development Programmes. School Leadership & Management, 33(5), 440-456.
Jenny, R., Turner, E., Morris, B., & Christine, F. (2005) Changing their minds: the social dynamics of school leaders' learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 253-273. doi:10.1080/03057640500147219
Matheson, I., & Murray, R. (2011). Preparing for Headship: the impact of professional study on professional knowledge and leadership practices.
Menter, I. Holligan, C. & Mthenjwa, V. (2003).  SQH Key Issues from the Evaluation Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
Menter, I. (2005). Reaching the parts that need to be reached? The impact of the Scottish Qualification for Headship. School leadership & management. 25(1), 7.
Research-Informed Teacher Learning: Critical Perspectives on Theory, Research and Practice. London: Routledge.
O'Brien, J., & Draper, J. (2001). Developing effective school leaders? Initial views of the Scottish Qualification for Headship (SQH). Journal of In-Service Education, 27(1), 109-122

Watt, G., Bloomer, K., Christie, I., Finlayson, C., & Jaquet, S. (2014). Evaluation of routes to headship: appendices.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Poster

Elementary 1:1 iPad Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Design-based Research Study

Laura Pellizzer, Marina De Rossi

University of Padua, Italy

Presenting Author: Pellizzer, Laura

Since the beginning of the new millennium, great efforts have been made at a European level on the integration of digital in education to overcome the monomediality, frontality, and transmissiveness of teaching-learning processes (e.g., European Commission et al., 2017).

Among the digital devices on the market, iPads, and other similar tablets, stand out for their affordances including portability, easy access to information, multitouch screen, and readiness for collaborative work (e.g., Henderson & Yeow, 2012). This translates into increasing autonomy, commitment, and motivation in learning activities, but also offering multiple opportunities to access the curriculum and a high degree of differentiation of the user's educational experience. Hence, one-to-one (1:1) learning initiatives started to be launched in Europe, especially in the Nordic countries. 1:1 learning initiatives are equipping all students of a given school, class, or age group with portable devices (e.g., laptops, netbooks, tablets, or smartphones) for learning purposes both at school and home (Bocconi et al., 2013).

However, research has long shown how the availability and adoption of digital equipment in the classroom are not automatically related to pupils’ academic performance (e.g., Hattie, 2009, 2015; Higgins et al., 2012, 2016). In other words, it is not the technology itself that makes the difference in achieving positive academic outcomes but how teachers integrate technologies in the classroom to improve and innovate education and training (Redecker & Punie, 2017). Therefore, what plays a significant role in influencing teachers’ behavior in the classroom is their preparation and perceptions of ICT integration (Abel et al., 2022). Unfortunately, most of the studies reveal teachers are not yet digitally competent (Fernández-Batanero et al., 2022). This became even clearer during the Covid-19 pandemic when teachers were revealed to be unprepared to set up forms of digital education (Lucisano, 2020; Ranieri et al., 2020).

It follows how important it is to intensify investment in didactic innovation, especially in terms of digital skills training in teachers (Commissione europea, 2020; European Commission et al., 2021 Ranieri et al., 2020). Teacher digital competence lies in knowing how to effectively integrate and use digital technologies at every stage of teaching and learning activities, considering the different contexts of use (European Commission et al., 2017).

Therefore, the study aimed at investigating the impact of a 1:1 iPad integration pilot project in a elementary school classroom through a professional development (PD) initiative with in-service teachers. PD is critical in enhancing teachers’ technology competence and confidence, thus promoting the successful use of technology in their teaching and students’ academic achievements (Abel et al., 2022). The study lasting one and a half calendar years involved 2 in-service teachers, a total of 23 first-grade (s.y. 2021-2022) pupils (13 female and 10 male), and their parents, of a elementary school in the Veneto Region, Italy. In addition, a control group of 17 students with similar background characteristics was also involved.

The application of a Design-Based Research (DBR) was chosen in the implementation and refinement of the teachers’ PD program. The DBR methodology is characterized by 1) being situated in a real educational context, 2) solving a real problem from the context, 3) focusing on the design and testing of a significant intervention, and 4) involving close collaboration between the researcher and stakeholders and multiple iterations to reach the best design of the intervention (Philippakos et al., 2021). A study on the use of iPad in teaching-learning processes in an Apple Distinguished School abroad was also performed.

At the end of the experimentation, the impact of the project will be determined in terms of teachers' PD and students' learning outcomes achieved thanks to the use of the digital tool.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The initial problem to be solved in this DBR was the introduction of iPads in teaching.
At the beginning of the experimentation (September-October 2021), we detected teachers' methodological choices in their classroom practices through observation tools, semi-structured interviews with teachers, and focus groups with pupils. In parallel, we tested the initial learning profiles of the students, and we surveyed the students' level of familiarity with the use of digital tools by administering a questionnaire to their parents.
The first phase was followed by the revision of scientific literature and the look at existing practices to identify possible solutions to the initial problem (December 2021-March 2022). For this reason, it was decided to carry out a study of a successful school case that is part of the Apple Distinguished School circuit (March-April 2022).
Based on the results of this second phase, the first implementation of solutions took place (April-June 2022). This phase also followed progressive steps: from a modeling phase in which the researcher carries out activities with the iPads (3w./week) and the class teacher supports and observes to a scaffolding phase in which the teacher performs activities with the iPads (3w./week) and the researcher supports and observes. Constant co-design and co-reflection processes were also carried out during this phase.
At the end of the school year (May-June 2022), the progress of teachers’ methodologies and students’ learning achievements were monitored by repeating the semi-structured interviews with teachers, and the focus groups and tests with pupils.
New objectives for the school year 2022-2023 were set and implemented through a fading phase in which the teacher becomes more and more autonomous in the conduct of activities (September-December 2022).
At the end of the experimentation (December 2022), final tests on teachers’ methodologies and students’ learning outcomes were carried out.
In the development of the project, the continuous collaboration between actors with different professional profiles and responsibilities led to the consideration of the technological, social, and pedagogical affordances of the technological tool in order to subsequently initiate the instructional design and the proposal of activities in the classroom.

The following research questions guide this study:
- What are the characteristics of a 1:1 initiative of iPad integration in a novice school in the use of iPads as teaching-learning tools?
- What impacts occur in terms of teachers' methodological choices?
- What are the effects of these changes on student learning outcomes?

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The data collected from the entire experimentation are about to be analyzed. Therefore, it is not possible to report here the results and deduce the conclusions of this study. However, they will be available in the coming months.
For now, we would like to stress that the school context where we carried out our research appears interesting as it is among the first ones in Italy to have started a 1:1 initiative with iPads in elementary school. The choice of a first-grade class was strategic to allow an approach to the use of technologies and devices at an early stage of schooling so that technological imprinting could take place without the presence of ICT usage habits like mere leisure and entertainment, as happens at an older age. Therefore, this study promises to provide important insights into the issue of ICT integration in education during the first years of schooling.
Moreover, thanks to Design-Based Research methodology, a synergy has been created between different professional figures that have given solidity to the project since its beginning. The study of the successful school abroad also proved to be useful. This helped steer the study in the right direction, giving a vision of how it means integrating such a device every day at school for learning purposes.
At the end of the study, we expect to be able to draw up a report on the implementation of the integration of the tool in teaching and learning processes and to detect its impacts in terms of teachers' professional development, as the ability to shift teaching practices from traditional teacher-centered to socio-constructivist student-centered methods. Lastly, we hope to detect areas of positivity of the tool in terms of impact on students’ learning.

References
Abel, V.R., Tondeur, J., & Sang, G. (2022). Teacher Perceptions about ICT Integration into Classroom Instruction. Education Sciences, 12(9), 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci12090609  
Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled Innovation for Learning: the case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12021
Commissione Europea (2020). Comunicazione della Commissione al Parlamento Europeo, al Consiglio, al Comitato Economico e Sociale Europeo e al Comitato delle Regioni. Piano d'azione per l'istruzione digitale 2021-2027. Ripensare l'istruzione e la formazione per l'era digitale.
European Commission, JRC, Carretero, S., Napierała, J., & Bessios, A. (2021). What did we learn from schooling practices during the COVID-19 lockdown?: insights from five EU countries. Publications Office.
Fernández-Batanero, J.M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of Visible Learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). iPad in Education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a pri-mary school (pp. 78-87). 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.390
Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., Villanueva-Aguilera, A.B., Coleman, R., Hen-Derson, P., Major, L.E., Coe, R., & Mason, D. (2016). Sutton Trust-Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit. Education Endowment Foundation.
Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Full Report. Education Endowment Foundation.  
JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Brečko, B. (2014). Mainstreaming ICT-enabled innovation in education and training in Europe: policy actions for sustainability, scalability and impact at system level. Publications Office.
Lucisano, P. (2020). Fare ricerca con gli insegnanti. I primi risultati dell’indagine nazionale SIRD “Per un confronto sulle modalità di didattica a distanza adottate nelle scuole italiane nel periodo di emergenza COVID-19”. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 17(36), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.19241/lll.v16i36.551
Philippakos, Z.A., Howell, E., & Pellegrino, A. (Eds.) (2021). Design-Based Research in Education. Theory and Applications. Guilford.
Ranieri, M., Gaggioli, C., & Borges, M.K. (2020). La didattica alla prova del Covid-19 in Italia: uno studio sulla Scuola Primaria. Praxis educativa, 15, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.16307.079
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Poster

Establishing a Culture of Employability through University-Industry Collaboration in Real-World Learning

Kim Wilcox

Solent University, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Wilcox, Kim

An increasingly performative culture in higher education has tied the concept of ‘teaching excellence’ to ‘employability’. Consequently, higher education institutions and their academic teaching staff have been encouraged to rethink their approaches to embedding employability in the curriculum by collaborating with industry partners in the provision of ‘real-world learning’ (RWL) opportunities. Indeed, political discourse has positioned a culture of partnership at the forefront of higher education practice, reinforcing the importance of a positive experience of collaboration for all. The review of literature noted a prevalence of studies which have sought to identify and disseminate good practice in the development of real-world learning through collaboration. However, research into how collaborative practices can cultivate learners capable of transferring knowledge to real-world scenarios is in its infancy. Specifically, the lack of investigation into what employability means to students, academic staff and industry practitioners in the context of their experiences of RWL has been noted.

Focusing on the growing trend for collaboration between universities and industry partners in RWL provision and a desire to illuminate the diversity of experiences, this research examined a ‘direct’ model of collaboration (Bolden et al., 2009) involving one UK university and one local industry partner operating in the sport development sector. The resulting programme of RWL was aligned to a subject-specific strand of modules which were offered at the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Level 4, Level 5 and Level 6 of one undergraduate degree course. Through the RWL programme, academic tutors and industry practitioners jointly supported students in applying subject-specific knowledge and skills to the real-world, via a combination of case studies, live briefs and extra-curricular activities, with the aim of enhancing employability for a career in the sport industry.

Adopting an interpretivist case study design and taking the programme as an illustrative example of RWL in UK higher education, three research questions were posed 1) How do stakeholders conceptualise and orientate to employability? 2) How is RWL experienced by different stakeholders? 3) How are stakeholders’ conceptualisations of employability and experiences of RWL related to the creation and maintenance of an employability culture?

The experiences of nine students, two academic tutors and four industry practitioners involved in the programme were explored via semi-structured interviews. A crystallised approach to analysis highlighted a series of critical incidents in the stakeholder experience of RWL. It is argued that stakeholders’ behavioural responses to such incidents are intertwined with their perception of the various aspects and functions of the RWL programme in which they are engaged and that these perceptions are simultaneously influenced by their beliefs about ‘employability’ in this context. Consequently, tension between stakeholders’ idealised beliefs about ‘employability’ and the reality of the RWL experiences provided through a university-industry collaboration actually presented challenges in the creation of the employability culture that such a programme of RWL demands. I therefore offer a ‘Framework for Establishing a Culture of Employability in RWL’ which is intended for educationalists to consider how the operations of a RWL programme may be manipulated to constrain or reify the occurrence of those critical incidents which will ultimately influence a stakeholder’s perception of the RWL programme and their beliefs or conceptions of ‘employability’.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A crystallised approach to data analysis and representation presented an opportunity to explore multiple ways of understanding the lived experience, acknowledging that each account gleaned through semi-structured interviews with students, academic tutors and practitioners relies on the presence or absence of others. Ellingson’s (2009) ‘dendritic’ crystallisation was adopted to achieve a pragmatic blend of inductive, deductive and abductive reasoning across three distinct phases of analysis, rooted in Derrida’s (1978) approach to deconstruction.
Derridean analysis is concept-driven, so the first phase sought to reveal the hierarchies in systems of thought relating to stakeholders’ conceptualisations of employability. This was achieved through an inductive thematic analysis of transcripts which revealed 22 conceptions of employability. These were organised into five belief systems which represented employability as occupational competence, as knowledge, as experience, as self-awareness and as fitting in. Findings illustrated contradictions in how stakeholders conceptualised and orientated to employability.
The second phase was approached deductively, with Third-Generation Activity Theory (Engeström, 1999) used as a lens to deconstruct the experience of the RWL programme. This revealed contradicting perspectives relating to 1) the recognition of identity, 2) the use of language as a mediational tool, 3) the expectations of own and others’ boundaries of responsibility, 4) the perception of mutual benefit.

The third phase set about reconstructing a narrative of the experience. This was deductively informed by Bildungsroman as a genre of narrative inquiry whereby personal growth is said to occur despite or because of various tribulations. I refer to these dissonances as ‘critical incidents’ in the stakeholder experience of RWL. The crystallisation of narratives revealed tensions between the ideal and the reality and demonstrated how critical incidents in the lived experience provide a forum for stakeholders’ beliefs about employability, which are manifested in their employability orientation, to be constrained or reified.
Finally, abductive reasoning was applied to bring all three phases together. A theoretical contribution is made in the form of a ‘Framework for Establishing a Culture of Employability in RWL’. The Framework highlights the diversity of social and cultural practices influencing a range of stakeholder expectations and motivations for participating in an educational programme based on university-industry collaboration, and how this can create an expectation gap (Patrick et al., 2008). The primary intention of the Framework is to support the identification of contradictions which lead to mismatches in perspectives and enables practitioners to seek solutions for the development of a culture of effective collaboration.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Dewey (1933, p.22) stated that “we never educate directly, but indirectly by means of the environment. Whether we permit chance environments to do the work, or whether we design environments for the purpose makes a great difference”. Of course, the environment can refer to physical learning spaces or the overall culture of that learning space. On this basis, I conclude that critical incidents in the stakeholder experience mediate the culture of employability associated with the programme of RWL. Freeman et al. (2010) emphasised the importance of ensuring a culture that supports all stakeholders to see value in the collaboration by working on a greater alignment of their diverse interests. Where stakeholders feel that a programme of RWL is aligned to their values and beliefs about employability, they will have a positive outlook on such experiences. This sets the course for a positive orientation to employability development. Consequently, stakeholders’ employability orientation is positively associated with the creation and maintenance of employability culture (Nauta et al., 2009). The ‘Framework for Establishing a Culture of Employability in RWL’ demonstrates how we can manipulate the system, structure and operation of a programme, in response to belief systems relating to the meaning of employability and critical incidents in the experience of RWL, to ultimately bridge the gap between the ideal and reality. I am interested exploring its application to further instances of university-industry collaboration, particularly in terms of its potential to encourage stakeholders to discuss their beliefs, perceptions and actions and thus enable them to see their own and others’ truths in a more constructed, less idealised light.
References
Bolden, R., Connor, H. Duquemin, A., Hirsh, W. and Petrov, G. (2009) Employer Engagement with Higher Education: Defining, Sustaining and Supporting Higher Skills Provision (A Higher Skills Research Report for HERDA South West and HEFCE). London: HEFCE.

Derrida, J. (1978) Structure, sign and play. In: Writing and difference (Translated by A. Bass) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Dewey, J. (1933) How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D.C. Heath.

Ellingson, L. L. (2009) Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Engeström, Y. (1999) ‘Activity theory and individual and social transformation’. in Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R.L. (eds), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.19-38.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., and de Colle, S. (2010) Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nauta, A., van Vianen, A., van der Heijden, B., van Dam, K. and Willemsen, M. (2009) ‘Understanding the factors that promote employability orientation: The impact of employability culture, career satisfaction, and role breadth self-efficacy’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, pp.233–251.

Patrick, C.J., Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M. and Pretto, G. (2008) The WIL (work integrated learning) report: A national scoping study. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Poster

Developing a Formative Proposal for Initial Teacher Education Based on STEAM Approach and Creative Thinking Development

Erika Ribeiro, Ana V. Rodrigues

CIDTFF - University of Aveiro, Portugal

Presenting Author: Ribeiro, Erika

This research project aims to develop, validate and evaluate a training proposal with a Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics (STEAM) approach that promotes creative thinking and teaching skills for the initial training of Primary School pre-service teachers (PST). It aims to contribute to the design of a course elaborated based on the formative proposal and their results, and also elaborate a set of guiding principles for similar formative strategies.

Educating people to achieve future and current needs, demands that we accomplish not only several learning competencies for the 21st century (P21, 2015) but also their impact on society. Science Education (SE) aims to educate citizens to be prepared to their right and duty to make decisions in a conscious and responsible way with the current society and future generations (Galvão et al., 2016).

To consolidate an education that promotes an integrated worldview, it´s crucial to have teachers scientifically prepared and aware of the several kinds of teaching-learning strategies (Rodrigues & Martins, 2018). Therefore, it´s essential that since the beginning of teacher education, teachers are presented to an integrated SE perspective through a Science, Technology and Society (STS) (Vieira et al., 2011) / Science, Technology, Society and Environment (STSE) orientation (Rodrigues, 2011).

STEAM education is an inquiry-based approach to teaching and learning, grounded in active learning methodologies and with an emphasis on real-world problem-solving (Shernoff et al., 2017). This approach not only proposes interdisciplinary learning through STEAM areas, but also prepares learners for the professional context by developing skills such as good communication, collaborative work, and the enhancement of interpersonal skills (Perignat & Katz-Buonincontro, 2019).

Based on this premise, Challenge Based Learning (CBL) methodology aims to, in a collaborative, multidisciplinary and experiential way, identify, investigate and propose solutions to real problems with an STS orientation (Nichols et al., 2016). From this perspective, the integration of STEAM and CBL has been described as having great potential for the development of 21st-century learning skills (P21, 2015), such as creativity, problem-solving, and others (Sanders, 2019).

The association of these active learning methodologies in SE since the early years, prepares future generations to be real-problem solvers, applying cross-disciplinary concepts coupled with their creative, critical and collaborative skills (Burrows & Slater, 2015). This project highlights the development of creativity throughout learning process. Creativity is a cross-disciplinary skill to produce ideas and strategies, individually or collectively, that are original, critical, plausible and feasible (Beghetto, 2007; Craft, 2009). The educational context should be a driver of human creativity, not a limiting factor (Robinson & Aronica, 2015).

Based on the theoretical background presented, research questions and respective objectives were settled for this research:

General Question: How creative thinking and teaching skills can be promoted for science primary school teaching through a STEAM approach?

Specific Questions:

SQ1. How to develop a proposal for pre-service primary teachers' initial training through a STEAM approach promoting creative thinking?

SQ2. What are the effects of the STEAM formative proposal on developing creative thinking in pre-service primary teachers?

SQ3. What is the relation between the creative thinking level and developing primary science teaching competencies?

Research Goals:

G1. To develop (design, plan, validate, implement and evaluate) a STEAM & Creativity formative proposal that promotes the creative thinking of pre-service teachers.

G2. To evaluate the effects of the STEAM & Creativity formative proposal on the level of creative thinking and its relation to developing teaching skills.

G3. To develop a set of recommendations from the research results for primary school science teacher training.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This is a qualitative study framed within a sociocritical paradigm due to its interventive, transformative and emancipatory nature (Creswell, 1994). This research is stated in a Design-Based Research (DBR) method (Romero-Ariza, 2014), a participatory and interventionist strategy that seeks to solve practical problems and develop principles and theories by serving as a bridge between practice, research, and policy (McKenney & Reeves, 2012). DBR adopts cycles of analysis, design, implementation, evaluation, and redesign to prototype innovative responses that best suit the investigative and practice needs (Reeves, 2006).

Data collection techniques adopted are document compilation, participant and non-participant observation, focus group and questionnaire surveys for subsequent triangulation of the data collected. For data analysis, it´s used qualitative analysis through categorial content analysis (Bardin, 2009).

The project consists of five phases: Phase 1 – Theoretical and concept framework: To do a systematic literature review to design a theoretical framework on STEM/STEAM Education; Creativity/Creative Thinking; Initial Primary Teachers; Science Teaching. Followed by Phase 2 - Project design: To design, plan and validate sessions and instruments of the formative proposal, in blended learning modality, based on the theoretical framework built in the previous phase.

The next step is Phase 3 - Project Implementation: this phase will be divided into three cycles of proposal implementation and two cycles of redesign & analysis. There will be interleaved stages of implementation and analysis, as with a prior analysis of the data collected in the previous cycle, so it can be done changes in order to improve the next implementation cycle. This phase is carried out with undergraduate and master's degree students in education.

With all data collected starts Phase 4 - Evaluation of the project: To carry out a cross-analysis of the data collected in the previous phase, analyze them using the categorical content analysis technique. Also, identify potential impacts and didactic transpositions in internship projects of the students involved. To conclude, Phase 5 - Product Dissemination: to transform the formative proposal into its final version, a course available entirely online to contribute to teacher education (initial or continuing). And also, create and validate, through the results found, a set of potential guiding principles that emerged from this research project.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
This research aims to promote interdisciplinary knowledge combined with the development of creativity, as a problem-solving skill, so that future citizens and scientists can overcome challenges from different natures. The study is now concluding the last implementation cycle (Phase 3) so it is only possible to discuss some preliminary results.
The results analyzed until now shows that the pre-service teachers involved appreciate the experience during the activities proposed and validate a positive impact on their professional training. As well as they can demonstrate an increase in the perception development of transversal skills (collaborative work; communication; creativity; proactivity; critical thinking; autonomy), science literacy, teaching, and learning methodologies/resources.
As the content of current feedback with participants, the integration of CBL and creative thinking, through a STEAM approach it´s been well accepted by the students. Even though it still needs to conclude the analysis of the data gathered, participants highlighted having a positive experience with active learning methodologies and varied teaching and learning strategies, as well as how they intend to use them in the future with their students.
As a research product, we expect to design a formative proposal, as a course available entirely online and free, based on the results that emerged from this study. So, it can contribute to education for primary school science teachers. Also, to build a validated set of guiding principles for other courses in the same field.
 This work is financially supported by National Funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. under the Project UI/BD/152209/2021
This work is financially supported by National Funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. under the Project UIDB/00194/2020

References
Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 7
Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Legacy projects: Helping young people respond productively to the challenges of a changing world. Roeper Review, 39, 187–190.
Burrows, A., & Slater, T. (2015). A proposed integrated STEM framework for contemporary teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Practice, 28(2/3), 318–330.
Craft, A. (2010). Creative Thinking in the Early Years of Education. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 5146(April 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0957514032000
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
Galvão, C., Reis, P., Freire, S., & Faria, C. (2011). Ensinar Ciências, Aprender Ciências: O contributo do projeto internacional PARSEL para tornar a ciência mais relevante para os alunos. Porto: Porto Editora.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research: What it is, How we do it, and Why. Routledge
Nichols, M., Cator, K., & Torres, M. (2016). Challenge Based Learning Guide. In Digital Promise and The Challenge Institute (Issue November). Digital Promise.
P21 (Partnership for 21st Century Learning). (2017). P21 Framework definitions. Washington, DC
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(October 2018), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker (Ed.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Rodrigues, A. V. (2011). A Educação em Ciências no Ensino Básico em Ambientes Integrados de Formação. Tese de doutoramento não publicada. Departamento de Educação da Universidade de Aveiro.
Rodrigues, A. V., & Martins, I. P. (2018). Formação Inicial de Professores para o Ensino das Ciências nos primeiros anos em Portugal. In Formação inicial e continuada de professores de ciências: o que se pesquisa no Brasil, Portugal e Espanha. (pp. 179–198). Edições Hipótese.
Romero-Ariza, M. (2014). Uniendo investigación, política y práctica educativas: DBR, desafíos y oportunidades. Revista Internacional de Investigación En Educación, 7(14), 159.
Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM education: primer. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
Shernoff D. J., Sinha S., Bressler D. M. and Ginsburg L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education, Int. J. STEM Educ., 4(13), 1–16.
Vieira, R. M., Vieira-Tenreiro, C., & Martins, I. P. (2011). A Educaçãoem Ciências com Orientação CTS -atividades para o ensino básico. Porto: Areal Editores


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Poster

A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Education Study Programs of Selected Universities in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates

Talar Agopian

Charles University, Czech Republic

Presenting Author: Agopian, Talar

Teacher Education (TE) study programs play a crucial role in providing efficient preparation to prospective teachers for their teaching career. The quality of teacher preparation determines the effectiveness of classroom instruction which in turn influences the quality of student learning (National Research Council, 2010, in Feuer et al., 2013). Hence, it is important to ensure that prospective teachers receive good preparation. The aims of this study are to identify the structural components of TE programs, to examine the balance between theoretical and practical courses, and to analyze the TE programs in selected universities from Lebanon and United Arab Emirates (UAE) by benchmarking them against the conceptual orientations of the theoretical framework of Feiman-Nemser.

In Lebanon, TE programs are offered by fifteen universities (El-Mouhayar & BouJaoude, 2012). Elementary school teachers are required to receive three years of undergraduate education at the Education Department of any university to receive a Bachelor of Arts degree in Education or in Elementary Education. Furthermore, students holding a bachelor’s degree in any other field who want to become teachers can receive a TD by completing an additional year of study (“Education in Lebanon,” 2018).

The development of TE programs in the UAE has gone through several steps. In 1979, the Ministry of Education founded two-year teacher training colleges. In the mid-1980s, the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), the first public university in the UAE, took over the responsibility of teacher preparation from the government. (Gardner, 1995, in Gallagher, 2019). In 1998, the College of Education at Zayed University initiated TE. Afterwards, UAE’s first teachers’ college, Emirates College for Advanced Education (ECAE), started in-country TE (Gallagher, 2019). Obtaining a Bachelor of Education in the UAE equips graduates to be able to teach students of different ages. For the secondary grades, many schools require a degree in the teacher’s field of expertise in addition to the degree in education. (“Bachelor of Education in the UAE,” n.d.).

The theory of Sharon Feiman-Nemser will be used as a framework. According to this theory, a set of ideas that guides the practical activities in TE programs is known as an “orientation.” Such practical activities can be identified as developing courses, teaching, supervising, assessing, and planning programs. An orientation would identify the goals of TE and the ways of realizing these goals. Views of teaching and learning and theories about learning how to teach make a “conceptual orientation.” Five conceptual orientations have been identified, each having a proposition that features certain aspects of teaching and TE programs: academic, practical, technological, personal, and critical/social orientations (Feiman-Nemser, 1990).

Examining the effectiveness of TE programs may provide insight into how well graduates are prepared and equipped to satisfy the requirements of their workplace (Mayer et al., 2015). Exploring the course offerings, the required hours, practicum policies and hours, and the number of required content courses provides the possibility to make comparisons across different programs. Such types of information are usually accessible on institution websites and catalogs, and hence a researcher who is not an insider may access them and examine them (Feuer et al., 2013).

Based on the theoretical framework, a review of relevant literature, and a survey of the TE program structures of the universities from Lebanon and UAE selected for this study, the following research questions have been identified:

- Which theoretical elements of the conceptual framework of Feiman-Nemser theory are implemented in the TE curricula of universities in Lebanon and the UAE?

- What is the distribution of theoretical and practical courses in the structural frameworks of the TE programs of universities in Lebanon and the UAE?


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
In this study, TE programs of selected universities in Lebanon and the UAE will be surveyed through university websites and course catalogues and benchmarked against Feiman-Nemser’s theory’s five conceptual orientations: academic, practical, technological, personal, and critical/social orientations.
An examination of TE programs provides an understanding of the program structure, content, distribution of courses, and the practical experience prospective teachers receive (Mayer et al., 2015). TE program evaluations can be achieved by examining different forms of evidence used to measure TE attributes. For example, to evaluate the quality of instruction, course syllabi, textbooks, hours, and the number of required content courses may be reviewed; to assess the quality of student teaching experiences, practicum hours and qualifications of mentors may be considered (Feuer et al., 2013). Surveying publicly available online information about TE programs on university websites provides documentation of program content, length, and structure, practical experiences, and the balance between theory and practice (Mayer et al., 2015).
According to Feiman-Nemser (1990), teacher preparation programs can be analyzed through structural and conceptual models. Structural models focus on the general organization of programs such as the number of years to complete a program, the number of required credit hours of education and content, the duration of field-based experience, and alternative certification methods. Conceptual models, on the other hand, reflect different insights about teacher preparation and accentuate the importance of orientations derived from the different views of teaching and theories of learning to teach.
The information in this comparative study will be derived from the websites and course catalogues of the selected universities from Lebanon and the UAE that are part of the study. To compare TE programs in Lebanon and in the UAE, the websites and course catalogues of the Modern University for Business and Science (MUBS) in Lebanon and the American University in the Emirates (AUE) in the UAE will be reviewed and analyzed.
To put the two universities of this study in the context of the larger framework, a survey will be done of 3 other universities from each of the countries that are being compared. From Lebanon, in addition to MUBS, TE programs of Haigazian University (HU), the Lebanese University (LU), and the American University of Beirut (AUB) will be surveyed. From the UAE, in addition to AUE, TE programs of the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), the Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), and Zayed University (ZU) will be examined.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
One of the main issues related to TE in Lebanon is the lack of sufficient practical courses in TE programs (Freiha, 1997, as cited in BouJaoude & El-Mouhayar, 2010). According to BouJaoude and El-Mouhayar (2010), a critical issue in TE programs in Lebanon is that they do not emphasize field work. Another issue is the insufficient acquisition of classroom skills by prospective teachers. Concerning TE programs in the UAE, many universities require students to spend one semester teaching in a public school as part of their student teaching experience (Faculty of Education, 2003, in Al-Awidi & Alghazo, 2012). However, not much attention is paid to the practice teaching experience; it is viewed mainly as a part of studies that needs to be completed. Sometimes practice teaching is done in a traditional way: student teachers are placed in government schools to work with cooperating teachers, and the university supervisors visit them two or three times throughout the whole experience. This does not allow for a fruitful experience as university supervisors are not fully engaged in the schools, and the cooperating teachers are unaware of the practice teaching requirements (Ibrahim, 2013).
Based on a review of relevant literature and based on an initial surveying of the websites of MUBS and AUE, the two universities involved in this study, the following results can be expected: universities in Lebanon adopt the academic approach to teacher preparation more than universities in the UAE, and that universities in the UAE adopt the technological and critical/social approaches to teacher preparation more than universities in Lebanon. Moreover, the practical orientation of Feiman-Nemser’s theory is manifested in the practicum courses that both universities offer. However, it is expected that the theoretical courses in both universities will be more than the practical courses.

References
Al-Awidi, H. M., & Alghazo, I. M. (2012). The effect of student teaching experience on preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration in the UAE. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 923–941. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9239-4
Bachelor of Education in the UAE. (n.d.). School Apply. From https://www.schoolapply.com/bachelors-degree/bachelor-of-education/bachelor-of-education-in-the-uae/
BouJaoude, S., & El-Mouhayar, R. (2010). Teacher Education in Lebanon: Trends and Issues. International Handbook of Teacher Education World-wide, 2, 309-332.
Education in Lebanon. (2018, December 17). WENR. From https://wenr.wes.org/2017/05/education-in-lebanon
El-Mouhayar, R., & BouJaoude, S. (2012). Structural and Conceptual Foundations of Teacher Education Programs in Selected Universities in Lebanon. Recherches Pédagogique: Revue éditée par la Faculté de Pédagogie de l’Université Libanaise, Beyrouth, 22, 37-60.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Teacher Preparation: Structural and Conceptual Alternatives. In W. R. Houston. M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook for Research on Teacher Education, (pp. 212-233). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Feuer, M. J., Floden, R. E., Chudowsky, N., and Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options.  Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
Gallagher, K. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities in Sourcing, Preparing and Developing a Teaching Force for the UAE. In Education in the United Arab Emirates (pp. 127-145). Springer, Singapore.
Ibrahim, A. S. (2013). Approaches to supervision of student teachers in one UAE teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.002
Mayer, D., Allard, A., Bates, R., Dixon, M., Doecke, B., Kline, J., … Hodder, P. (2015). Studying the Effectiveness of Teacher Education – Final Report (SETE). Deakin University, (November), 1–213. Retrieved from http://www.setearc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/SETE_report_FINAL_30.11.152.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany