Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Session Overview
Free communications 2: Modelling and Methods
Thursday, 31/Aug/2017:
2:30pm - 4:00pm

Session Chair: Jens Haueisen
Location: Room A-022
Uni-S Schanzeneckstrasse 1 3012 Bern

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
2:30pm - 2:45pm

The Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving the MEG Forward Problem

Maria Carla Piastra1,2, Andreas Nüßing1,2, Harald Bornfleth3, Robert Oostenveld4, Christian Engwer2, Carsten Wolters1

1Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis,University of Münster, Germany; 2Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of Münster, Germany; 3BESA GmbH, Graefelfing, Germany; 4Donders Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Source reconstruction is used to improve the interpretation of surface-level electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements. It has been shown that combined EEG/MEG provides source reconstructions that outperform the ones provided by single modalities. To compute the EEG/MEG source reconstruction, which is an inverse problem, the forward problem has to be solved. When computing the EEG/MEG forward problem in realistically shaped head models, numerical methods have to be adopted. In this work, we deal with finite element methods (FEMs), focusing on fulfilling the conservation of charge law. Specific consequences of the conservation law have been observed in an EEG study, where the unwanted phenomenon of “skull leakages” was overcome by using a discontinuous Galerkin FEM (DG-­FEM) instead of a classical, continuous Galerkin FEM (CG­-FEM). As a consequence of the conservation law fulfillment, in “leaky scenarios” the accuracy of EEG results is increased by the DG­-FEM scheme. In the same scenarios, it can be desirable to proceed with MEG investigations without changing the discretization underneath. When implementing the standard formulation of the MEG solution, the accuracy of the results is compromised by a non-­conservative current reconstruction. Here, we present an improved approach that exploits the conservation law, thus providing a conservative current reconstruction and leading to results in the same range of accuracy of the ones of a CG-­FEM implementation for MEG. Finally, DG­-FEM makes it possible to perform combined EEG and MEG forward computations using the same discretization in those scenarios where DG-­FEM leads to advantages.

2:45pm - 3:00pm

Comparison of different MEG beamformer implementations

Amit Kumar Jaiswal1,2, Jukka Nenonen1, Caroline Witton3, Paul Furlong3, Lauri Parkkonen1,2

1Elekta Oy, Finland; 2Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland; 3Aston Brain Center, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

Beamformers are often applied in estimating locations and strengths of neuronal sources underlying the measured MEG/EEG signals. Several MEG analysis toolboxes have implemented linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamformers, but there are still remaining issues such as the effects of novel interference suppression methods such as signal-space separation (SSS) and its variants. Differences in implementations and processing pipelines in the packages complicates the application of beamformers and may hinder their wider adoption in research and clinical uses.

In this study, we compared event-related beamformer results obtained with four software packages (Fieldtrip, SPM12, Elekta Beamformer and MNE Python) with different noise covariance matrices applied to raw and SSS-preprocessed data from a 306-channel Elekta MEG system.

First, we applied the packages on phantom data where location and strength of sources are known. There were substantial source localization differences (up to 10 mm) between results obtained from the different packages and SSS effected the results.

Next, we utilized somatosensory evoked responses acquired with the Elekta MEG device from a healthy subject. Electrical stimulation was delivered separately to the tip of four fingers of right hand, resulting in relatively weak SEF responses (~10 nAm). We computed the event-related beamformer power normalized by projected noise (Z2) images. The obtained sources from the packages were mostly localized in hand somatosensory area but there were 5-15 mm differences across the packages.

These implementation-dependent differences in results should be understood thoroughly, and guidelines for comparable use of different packages should be established to obtain reliable clinical results.

3:00pm - 3:15pm

Combined EEG/MEG source reconstruction of electric, hapto-tactile and pneumato-tactile somatosensory stimulation using realistic head volume conductor modeling

Marios Antonakakis1, Sophie Schrader2, Jens Haueisen3, Carsten Wolters4

1Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Germany; 2Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Germany; 33Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Informatics,Technische Universität Ilmenau, Germany; 4Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Germany

Combined magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography recordings were collected to investigate the differences in source reconstruction of the primary somatosensory cortex following electrical wrist stimulation of the median nerve (EW) and hapto-tactile (HT) and pneumato-tactile (PT) stimulation of the index finger. The functional data (275 gradiometers and 80 electrodes) were preprocessed for artifact elimination. Magnetic resonance images (T1w- and T2w-MRI scans) were collected and segmented into six compartments (skin, compacta, spongiosa, cerebrospinal fluid, grey and white matter). Furthermore, diffusion weighted MRI was measured allowing to model white matter conductivity anisotropy to investigate its influence on especially source orientation. A six-compartment anisotropic finite element head model was constructed with individually calibrated skull conductivity. With regard to the reconstruction of the P20 component, only small differences in source locations (7mm) among the three stimulations, while significant source orientation changes between EW and PT (53o degrees) and between EW and HT (40o degrees) and also significantly higher EW source amplitude (37.6 μAmm) than for HT (6.37 μAmm) and PT (7.83 μAmm) were found. Our results might be interpreted in the way that EW causes a higher number of pyramidal cells in somatosensory area 3b to synchronize leading then to better SNR. EW might thus be called the most robust type of somatosensory stimulation. However, compared to PT and HT stimulation, EW might be less acceptable because of slightly painly kind of stimulation, especially for long – lasting stimulations or application in children. Alternatively, HT might be used instead of EW avoiding any kind of discomfort.

3:15pm - 3:30pm

A fast EEG forward problem approximation method and its application to tissue conductivity estimation

Kostiantyn Maksymenko, Theodore Papadopoulo, Maureen Clerc

INRIA, France

Bioelectric source analysis in the human brain from scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals is sensitive to the conductivity of the different head tissues. Conductivity values are time and subject dependent, so non-invasive methods of conductivity estimation are necessary to fine tune the EEG models. In this work, we aim at estimating conductivity while solving the EEG source localization problem. To do this, we need to compute a forward EEG problem solution (so-called lead field matrix) for a large number of conductivity configurations.

Computing one lead field requires a matrix inversion which is computationally intensive for realistic head models. Thus, the required time for computing of a large number of solutions quickly becomes impractical. In this work, we propose a method which allows us to approximate the lead field matrix for a set of conductivity configurations, using only the exact solution for a small set of basis points from the conductivity space. Our approach accelerates the computing time, while the approximation error remains controlled.

Our method is tested for brain and skull conductivity estimation, with simulated and real EEG data. In the case of real data, we process EEG evoked potentials of median nerve stimulation. We used a single-dipole model to estimate both source location and conductivities of brain and skull. Our approximation method offers a performance similar to using exact lead field matrices, but with a remarkable gain of time.

3:30pm - 3:45pm

Comparative Analysis of Low and High Sampling Rates for EEG Data

Ceon Ramon1, Paolo Gargiulo2, Frank Zanow3

1University of Washington, United States of America; 2Reykjavik University, Iceland; 3ANT Neuro, Colosseum 22, 7521 PT Enschede, Netherlands

High density scalp EEG data is routinely collected with a sampling rate of 1 KHz. However, higher sampling rates of up to 16 KHz/channel are available. We examined what additional information can be derived from EEG data sampled at a higher rate. We compared power spectral densities (PSD) and phase clustering behavior of EEG data sampled at 16.384 KHz and at 1.024 KHz. The PSD plots were similar at both sampling frequencies. However, there were significant differences in the spatiotemporal analysis of EEG phase cone formations. The data of an adult subject was collected with an ANT Neuro 256-channel system (eego mylab) with 16.384 KHz/channel sampling frequency. This data set was down sampled at 1.024 KHz/channel for a comparative analysis. The PSD was calculated by use of Fourier transform in alpha, beta and gamma bands. The phase was calculated and unwrapped after taking Hilbert transform of the data in the gamma band. The spatiotemporal plots of the phase were made by using a montage layout of 256 equidistant electrode positions and stable phase cone structures and their clusters were extracted. The spatiotemporal plots of phase and instantaneous power both had detailed additional spatial features at higher sampling frequency which were missing or smoothed out at lower sampling frequency. The phase cluster rate was higher at higher sampling frequency. These results indicate that additional information about the formation of phase clusters and related cortical phase transitions can be derived from EEG data collected at a higher sampling rate.

3:45pm - 4:00pm

Complex-Gaussian Graphical Models to Infer Functional Connectivity from EEG: Theory and Applications

Ramesh Srinivasan, Anirudh Wodeyar

University of California, Irvine, United States of America

Functional connectivity can be measured with electroencephalography (EEG) data using a variety of metrics that emphasize different aspects of brain dynamics. Coherence, which measures the consistency of relative phase between channels, is a widely used measure of synchronization in different frequency bands and describes marginal dependence between channels. The interpretation of coherence as reflecting a functional connection in the brain is confounded by volume conduction of current and by common inputs to both channels. Spatial filtering (e.g., surface Laplacians) is often used to minimize volume conduction effects, but removes variance from the data providing only a partial view of the underlying network. Other approaches such as imaginary coherence introduce new distortions to coherence estimates. In this paper we assume that EEG data in a frequency band are generated by a complex multivariate normal (CMVN) in order to define a complex-Gaussian Graphical Model of the data. Conditional dependence between channels is reflected in the precision values of the model. Compared to coherence, precision estimates suppress volume conduction and common input effects, while providing, by way of the graphical lasso, a sparse estimate of the underlying network. We show through simulation that this model outperforms coherence as an estimate of connectivity and captures the most important features of the network. Examples provided demonstrate that Complex-Gaussian graphical models can be applied to either EEG time series (channel space) or reconstructed source time series (source space), to suppress the effects of volume conduction and common inputs, thereby obtaining genuine estimates of brain networks.

Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: BaCI 2017
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.110
© 2001 - 2017 by H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany