Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
 
Session Overview
Session
AsRES - ESG & Sustainability in Real Estate 4
Time:
Saturday, 15/July/2023:
4:00pm - 5:30pm

Chair: Kwong Wing CHAU, The University of Hong Kong
Location: CYT 209A

Room 209A, 2/F, Cheng Yu Tung Building, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大学郑裕彤楼 2楼 209A 室


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

The Impact of ESG Coverage, Evidence From Commercial Real Estate Green Asset Acquisitions Activities

Tien Foo Sing, Zhimin ZHANG

National University of Singapore, Singapore;

Discussant: Mingzhi HU (Zhejiang University of Technology);

Most of the recent ESG literature has studied how ESG rating affects investing behaviour in the capital markets but has little focus on the commercial real estate market. We contribute to the recent ESG and real estate literature by examining how ESG ratings affect the commercial real estate market and how ESG and non-ESG firms’ property transactions behave differently in the acquisition of green buildings in the United States from 2009 to 2021. We find that companies (acquirers) with ESG coverage and a higher level of ESG rating have a strong preference for green buildings and are willing to pay higher property premiums (9.33%), especially after the local natural disaster shock and green building certification announcement.



Sustainable design of sport facilities and their impact on valuation and community

Jae Won Kang1, David McLennan2, Chris Mamo3, Kristen Beck4, John Nicols5, Melissa Vogt6

1International College of Management, Sydney, Australia; 2International College of Management, Sydney, Australia; 3International College of Management, Sydney, Australia; 4International College of Management, Sydney, Australia; 5International College of Management, Sydney, Australia; 6International College of Management, Sydney, Australia;

Discussant: Jun QIU (Renmin University of China);

Sports facilities are an integral part of communities, providing a place for recreation, fitness, and social interaction. However, they can also have a significant environmental impact both during construction and operation. Sustainable design of sports facilities involves designing and building facilities that minimise negative environmental impacts, reduce energy consumption, promote sustainable practices and can positively impact the valuation and benefit the surrounding community. Sustainable metrics and design practices in the built environment are becoming increasingly important to stakeholders. Property valuers are more regularly including the sustainable features of the design in their considerations of an appropriate market value for particular assets. Sustainable design has the potential to optimise the market value and public perception of sporting facilities as well as the real estate that surrounds them. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of sustainable sports facility design on property valuation practice and to provide suggestions for valuers, architects, property asset managers and developers on how to align the benefits of community development and redevelopment or multi-purpose focus. Considering the recent emphasis on the reconversion and conservation of Olympic facilities, this study focused on sustainability features of sport facility design property value implications. This study analyses the world-leading model of Sydney Olympic Park community development and its success in shaping future policy directions for sustainable design of sports facilities. Best-practice sustainable design of sports facilities should consider not only the direct environmental impact (land use, construction materials, energy and water consumption, transport and waste generation) but must also address the long-term viability and usefulness of the facility to the community to ensure that it does not have the potential to consider a “white elephant” in the future.



Green building premium – the case of the Hong Kong residential market

Kwong Wing CHAU1, Derek Da Huo1, Ervi Liusman2

1The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. (China); 2Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. (China);

Discussant: Jiayu ZHANG (Harbin Institute of Technology);

Green Building Certification (GBC) is an attempt to improve the sustainability of buildings by the signaling to customers the greenness of buildings so that they can make more informed decision. A creditable third-party GBC should also facilitate governments to formulate policy to promote green buildings for creating a sustainable living environment in the long run.

Most previous studies show that an office building with GBC can command a higher rent / price (Green Build Premium or GBP) than those without. There is much less research on examining the why such premium exists. One directly observable reason is that the GBP of official buildings is a result of institution constraints imposed by corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy of many large corporations which explicitly prohibit them from renting non-green building. However, non-institutional factors such as environmental consciousness, tangible benefits (savings in energy and maintenance costs), supply side marketing tactics, and so on are also possible contributing factors.

Studying GBP in the residential buildings can eliminate the influence of the CSR effect, which allows us to examine non-institutional factors that affect GBP. Of the few studies that examined GBP in the residential market, their main focus was on the estimating the average GBP without analyzing the underlying causes of such premium. By examining the temporal and spatial variation in the GBP, we can infer the contributing factors to GBP.

This study finds that residential buildings with green labels command a premium and that the premium is does not decline over time. Furthermore, the green premium is higher in higher income areas.



The Retardation Factors and Countermeasures of Collective Forest Tenure Reform in China——Based on the Framework of Transaction Cost Economics

Yuhan Peng, Gang Chu, Yukun Guo

Southwest Minzu University, China, People's Republic of;

Discussant: Caixia LIU (Wageningen University & Research);

In recent years, China puts increasing emphasis on the balance of economic development and environmental preservation. A set of policies has been intensively made to accelerate the reform of collective forest institution, which is anticipated to bring positive effects on both economic and environmental fields. Compared to the rural land reform, however, this blueprint does not work very well and makes far less progress. In order to explore the factors which hinder the transformation of collective forest institution, this paper employs Williamson’s framework of Transaction Cost Economics, with the help of three analytical dimensions, namely asset specificity, uncertainty, and transaction frequency. On the side of those who buy the forest tenure, they hesitate to enter the forestry market because of the unchanging nature of forest land, frequent disastrous weather under the global warming, and the recession begotten by the slow-down of economic growth. On the side of those who mainly transfer the rights, the disincentives can ascribe to the peasants’ unchangeable occupational skills, backward agricultural machinery technology, counterproductive subsidy policy, and high rewards on breaching contracts. In the process of transition from the trilateral governance structure to the bilateral governance structure, the factors from two sides not only increase asset specificity as well as uncertainty, but also fail to raise exchange frequency, which eventually results in an unfavorable state of high transaction costs. So as to promote the ongoing reform, a series of measures aiming to reduce transaction costs should be thoroughly considered.



 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: 2023 AsRES-GCREC Conference
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.150+TC+CC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany