Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
PROD 1: Product Design & Engineering 1 Location: B8.1.1 Session Chair: Prof. Daniele Landi, Università degli studi di Bergamo Session Chair: Dr. Marco Rossoni, Politecnico di Milano | |
| Presentation 3 | |
Avolution: a multi-agent Framework for retrieval-grounded systematic Innovation University of Bergamo, Viale Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine, BG, Italy Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have created new opportunities for supporting engineering innovation and inventive problem solving. However, current AI-based ideation systems still exhibit important limitations, including weak integration between creative generation, prior-art analysis, novelty assessment, and iterative refinement within unified engineering-design workflows. This study presents Avolution, a retrieval-grounded multi-agent framework designed to support systematic innovation through the integration of TRIZ-inspired reasoning, engineering-design methodologies, retrieval-augmented generation, and generative AI. The proposed architecture coordinates specialized agents dedicated to problem reformulation, prior-art retrieval, inventive-trigger generation, exploratory concept generation, and design-around refinement. The workflow was implemented as a modular orchestration pipeline on the n8n platform, integrating patent repositories, scientific databases, web retrieval systems, and multimodal generative modules within a unified human-in-the-loop environment. Experimental validation was conducted across heterogeneous engineering-design scenarios involving compliant mechanisms, energy harvesting systems, and safety-critical transportation problems. Compared with unconstrained monolithic LLM ideation, the proposed framework expanded the explored solution space, improved technical grounding and prior-art awareness, and generated more contextually relevant and structurally differentiated engineering concepts. The results suggest that orchestrated retrieval-grounded multi-agent reasoning may represent a promising direction for supporting systematic engineering innovation beyond conventional generative-AI interaction paradigms. | |
